2011
DOI: 10.1614/ws-d-10-00054.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Methods for Measurement of Leaf-Cover Area and Biomass from Image Data

Abstract: Leaf-cover area is a widely required plant development parameter for predictive models of weed growth and competition. Its assessment is performed either manually, which is labor intensive, or via visual inspection, which provides biased results. In contrast, digital image processing enables a high level of automation, thereby offering an attractive means for estimating vegetative leaf-cover area. Nonetheless, image-driven analysis is greatly affected by illumination conditions and camera position at the time … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our image-based weed cover evaluations were highly correlated with aboveground weed biomass (Pearson's coefficient ¼ 0.8296), indicating these images were representative of potential weed competition, as suggested by multiple studies (Ngouajio et al, 1999;Lemieux et al, 2003;Lati et al, 2011). This type of unbiased weed cover evaluation (compared to usual visual estimates) also demonstrates that potential herbicide savings are high if weeds could be sprayed at high resolution (average weed cover values never exceeded 25%) (Fig.…”
Section: Weed Detection On the Inter-row During A Post-emergence Herbsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Our image-based weed cover evaluations were highly correlated with aboveground weed biomass (Pearson's coefficient ¼ 0.8296), indicating these images were representative of potential weed competition, as suggested by multiple studies (Ngouajio et al, 1999;Lemieux et al, 2003;Lati et al, 2011). This type of unbiased weed cover evaluation (compared to usual visual estimates) also demonstrates that potential herbicide savings are high if weeds could be sprayed at high resolution (average weed cover values never exceeded 25%) (Fig.…”
Section: Weed Detection On the Inter-row During A Post-emergence Herbsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In weed science, hyperspectral imaging has previously been used for site-specific weed management, particularly for weed crop classification (López-Granados, 2011; Herrmann et al, 2013; Shapira et al, 2013) or as a part of decision support system for herbicide application (Tellaeche et al, 2008; Lati et al, 2011). We could not find any reference to the use of this technology for early detection of herbicide response in young weeds (phenological stage of 3–4 true leaves).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision application of weed control treatments requires sensitive technology that can track, record, and compute information on leaf shape, color, surface, and edge features for separating a weed and a crop plant (Hearn 2009;Meyer et al 1998;Lati et al 2011;Slaughter et al 2008b;Tang et al 2003;Tellaeche et al 2011). The technology is still emerging and has a few challenges, including oc-cluded leaves, misshapen leaves, moving leaves, and dusty leaves (see Chapter 15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%