2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust methods to create ex vivo minimum deformation atlases for brain mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second‐level data processing included co‐registration, spatial smoothing, and group analysis (Supplementary Figure 1B). Nonlinear transformation (using ‘fnirt’ in FSL) was used to co‐register the distortion‐corrected EPI to the individual FSE image and then to a study‐specific template created based on 8 untreated YAC128 and 8 wild‐type mice in the Australian Mouse Brain Mapping Consortium (AMBMC) atlas space (http://www.imaging.org.au/AMBMC/) . Gaussian smoothing with full width at half maximum of 0.424 mm was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second‐level data processing included co‐registration, spatial smoothing, and group analysis (Supplementary Figure 1B). Nonlinear transformation (using ‘fnirt’ in FSL) was used to co‐register the distortion‐corrected EPI to the individual FSE image and then to a study‐specific template created based on 8 untreated YAC128 and 8 wild‐type mice in the Australian Mouse Brain Mapping Consortium (AMBMC) atlas space (http://www.imaging.org.au/AMBMC/) . Gaussian smoothing with full width at half maximum of 0.424 mm was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other population based templates relied on a comparable (Hikishima et al, 2011) or smaller (Risser et al, 2019) numbers of individuals of similar sex and age, but did not incorporate histological validation of the area boundaries. Further, the morphological averaging was performed with a higher number of iterations (20) than recommended (Janke et al, 2015), which allowed to better emphasize cytoarchitectonic features and transitions between individual brain structures. Thus, the present atlas likely provides a good representation of the average morphology and variability of the cortex among young adult, captive-born marmosets.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting image (Fig. 2C) is not biased towards any of the individual histological volumes (Avants and Gee, 2004), and, by taking advantage of the subpixel accuracy of the morphological averaging (Janke et al, 2015), has a higher spatial resolution than the input 3D images. The same set of transformations was applied to the segmentations of the input brain hemispheres (Fig.…”
Section: Average Template Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuing in the area of 3D atlasing, Janke and Ullman present Robust methods to create ex-vivo minimum deformation atlases for brain mapping [4], affirming that highly detailed ex-vivo 3D atlases of average structure are of critical importance to neuroscience and its current push to understand the global microstructure of the brain. They observe that multiple single slice histology sections can no longer provide sufficient detail of inter-slice microstructure and lack out of plane resolution, proposing instead two ex-vivo methods: High-field lMRI with the addition of contrast media that allows intact whole brain microstructure imaging with an isotropic resolution of 15 lm in mouse, and blockface imaging to image an entire brain in a rigorous fashion with an out of plane resolution of 10 lm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An exciting part of this work is the use of a specialized TissueCyte 1000 serial two-photon (STP) tomography system, which couples high-speed two-photon microscopy with automated blockface vibratome sectioning [3]. By imaging the blockface, STP tomography essentially eliminates tissue distortions that occur in conventional section-based histological methods, a method that many projects are using (see Janke and Ullman this volume [4]) yielding a series of highly conformed, inherently pre-aligned images amenable to more precise 3D spatial mapping. This methodology enables a new high resolution common coordinate framework for the brain that all Allen Institute data can be mapped to.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%