2019
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.2195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Mittag‐Leffler stabilisation of fractional‐order systems

Abstract: Dynamic models approximate physical phenomena to certain extent and ideal controllers are proposed. Nevertheless, when system specifications crave for better performance, additional robust controllers are considered. In this sense, a robust controller is proposed in this paper, which accounts for a general class of fractional-order systems, in order to compensate for matched and mismatched disturbances. The Mittag-Leffler stability of the solution of the closed-loop system is demonstrated for a class of fracti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nonlinear controller u NL aims to compensate gravitational torques. LMI based robust controllers with a nonlinear compensation of uncertainties have been proposed in [23], for the case of fractional-order systems, and without considering the presence of faults. By substituting the controller (4) into (3), one obtains…”
Section: Fault-tolerant Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear controller u NL aims to compensate gravitational torques. LMI based robust controllers with a nonlinear compensation of uncertainties have been proposed in [23], for the case of fractional-order systems, and without considering the presence of faults. By substituting the controller (4) into (3), one obtains…”
Section: Fault-tolerant Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…< n, n ∈ Z + , then the time-domain response to the fractional order system (19) with u(k) ≡ 0 has the following properties:…”
Section: Theorem 5 If N − 1 <mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractional calculus is a natural generalization of classical calculus and its inception can be traced back to the year 1695, when Leibniz provided the possible value of a half order derivative d0.5ffalse(xfalse)dx0.5 (see page 1 and page 3 of [20], page xi and page 1 of [17], page xxvii of [27] and page xvii of [25]). After over 300 years of development, fractional calculus has been widely used in many branches of science and engineering, and is particularly suitable for modeling and control physical plants [14,26] (see some other excellent papers [19,28,37] and their references for many examples).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent papers, some families of operators that involve generalized kernels in the fractional integral were proposed 35–38 . These operators can generalize classical results, for example, the stability analysis of the dynamic systems associated with these derivatives through Lyapunov methods or the study of the Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stability problem 39–45 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35][36][37][38] These operators can generalize classical results, for example, the stability analysis of the dynamic systems associated with these derivatives through Lyapunov methods or the study of the Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability problem. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Recently, 46 a significant progress was made in the stability theory of fractional-order systems with Atangana-Baleanu derivative of Caputo type, such that, the Lyapunov direct method can be considered throughout some interesting novel inequalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%