2016 European Control Conference (ECC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ecc.2016.7810452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust model predictive control for an uncertain smart thermal grid

Abstract: The focus of this paper is on modeling and control of Smart Thermal Grids (STGs) in which the uncertainties in the demand and/or supply are included. We solve the corresponding robust model predictive control (MPC) optimization problem using mixed-integer-linear programming techniques to provide a day-ahead prediction for the heat production in the grid. In an example, we compare the robust MPC approach with the robust optimal control approach, in which the day-ahead production plan is obtained by optimizing t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, DHS physical models typically include many state variables governed by nonlinear thermo-hydraulic equations, e.g., describing fluid and heat transport in water pipelines, resulting in a modeling complexity hardly tractable by standard optimization-based controllers. To overcome this issue, predictive controllers exploiting simplified models have been proposed in the literature, such as [9], [10], and [11], where the thermal dynamics of the DHS network are not modeled. Nevertheless, the accurate modeling of the network thermal dynamics is crucial for the optimal operation of DHS plants for several reasons: 1) network temperatures must respect operational constraints due to technical limits of thermal generators and to the proper heat supply to thermal loads (e.g., the water temperature supplied to each load must exceed a minimum lower bound [4], [12]) and 2) network thermal dynamics, if modeled, can be optimized to minimize heat losses and to increase the overall DHS efficiency.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, DHS physical models typically include many state variables governed by nonlinear thermo-hydraulic equations, e.g., describing fluid and heat transport in water pipelines, resulting in a modeling complexity hardly tractable by standard optimization-based controllers. To overcome this issue, predictive controllers exploiting simplified models have been proposed in the literature, such as [9], [10], and [11], where the thermal dynamics of the DHS network are not modeled. Nevertheless, the accurate modeling of the network thermal dynamics is crucial for the optimal operation of DHS plants for several reasons: 1) network temperatures must respect operational constraints due to technical limits of thermal generators and to the proper heat supply to thermal loads (e.g., the water temperature supplied to each load must exceed a minimum lower bound [4], [12]) and 2) network thermal dynamics, if modeled, can be optimized to minimize heat losses and to increase the overall DHS efficiency.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the buildings connected to the DH network were not modelled and therefore the flexibility provided by their thermal inertia was not considered. Farahani et al [8] also developed an MILP-based MPC to minimise the total heat production fed into a DH network with TES tanks. The MPC controlled the energy flows to minimise the total heat production costs of the CHP and boiler in the network.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A deterministic view on STGs was studied by a few researchers [24], [25], [26]. STGs with uncertain thermal energy demands have been considered in [27], where a MPC strategy was employed with a heuristic Monte Carlo sampling approach to make the solution robust. A dynamical model of thermal energy imbalance in STGs with a probabilistic view on uncertain thermal energy demands was established in [28], where a stochastic MPC with a theoretical guarantee on the feasibility of the obtained solution was developed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%