2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2832-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust modeling and optimization of borehole enlarging by helical milling of aluminum alloy Al7075

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, orthogonal test Error! Reference source not found.7], multi-objective genetic algorithm [8][9], robust optimization model [10][11][12][13] and grey correlation analysis [14][15][16] were used for solving above problems. Sheng [7] achieved the optimal parameter combination by analyzing horizontal range and contribution rate: spindle speed 2000 r/min, feed per tooth 0.07 mm/z, axial feed 0.25 mm/r.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, orthogonal test Error! Reference source not found.7], multi-objective genetic algorithm [8][9], robust optimization model [10][11][12][13] and grey correlation analysis [14][15][16] were used for solving above problems. Sheng [7] achieved the optimal parameter combination by analyzing horizontal range and contribution rate: spindle speed 2000 r/min, feed per tooth 0.07 mm/z, axial feed 0.25 mm/r.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And finally, the machining parameters of CFRP helical milling were optimized based on multi-objective genetic algorithm, three groups of optimization parameters were: when cutting speed were 100 m/min, 110 m/min and 120 m/min, respectively, the corresponding tangential feed per tooth were 0.05 mm/z, 0.06 mm/z, 0.05 mm/z, respectively, and the axial feed were all always 0.2 mm/r. Pereira and Rodrigues developed a multi-objective robust optimization model, which had better predicted the experimental results and determined the optimal parameter combinations were: cutting speed 66.2 m/min, tangential feed per tooth 2.7 m/z, and axial feed per tooth 79.3 m/z [10][11][12][13]. Wang and Tian [14][15] performed multi-objective optimization of machining parameters of helical milling in steady state based on grey correlation analysis, and the optimal parameter combinations were: spindle speed 3000 r/min, feed per tooth 0.9 mm/z, axial feed 1 mm/r (Tian); and cutting speed 80 m/min, feed per tooth 0.05 mm/z, axial feed 0.1 mm/r (Wang).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%