52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2013.6760030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust motion control of a robot manipulator via Integral Suboptimal Second Order Sliding Modes

Abstract: Abstract-This paper deals with the formulation of an Integral Suboptimal Second Order Sliding Mode control algorithm oriented to solve motion control problems for robot manipulators, taking into account the presence of unavoidable modelling uncertainties and external disturbances affecting the systems. The proposed algorithm is designed so that the socalled reaching phase, normally present in the evolution of a system controlled via a Sliding Mode controller, is reduced to a minimum. Moreover, since the relati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To acquire the joints positions, resolvers are fastened on the three motors. The controller has a sampling time equal to t s =0.001 s. Note that, the performance obtained during experiments are comparable with the results attained in simulation, as published in [30]. Hereafter, for the sake of brevity, only the parametric and initial values of the algorithm applied in simulation are reported.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To acquire the joints positions, resolvers are fastened on the three motors. The controller has a sampling time equal to t s =0.001 s. Note that, the performance obtained during experiments are comparable with the results attained in simulation, as published in [30]. Hereafter, for the sake of brevity, only the parametric and initial values of the algorithm applied in simulation are reported.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The comparison based on experimental tests with the results obtained by using a standard PD controller and the original Suboptimal algorithm shows the superiority of the present proposal and confirms its applicability in an industrial context. Note that a preliminary version of this work, not reporting the proofs of the results, and only including simulations has been published in [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One key advantage of this evolution is the fixed number of calibration parameters. In fact, with the STBA method [34], there is no a-priori knowledge of the optimal number of regions in which the (σ,σ) phase-plane should be divided to get an efficient chattering alleviation. Conversely, with the EKF, the number of parameters to be calibrated depends on the dimension of the observed state.…”
Section: Sm Virtual Sensor With Accuracy Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By considering the derivative∆T of the output of the PI controller, given by (34), one can see that its value is bounded, as long as the input error e Fx is bounded and has bounded derivative. This can be proved straightforward, considering that the rate of change of the estimated forces is indeed determined by the chosen gain K x .…”
Section: B Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, F x is helpful to design an antilock brake system [6][7][8], and F z could be used in load spectrum analysis [9,10]. Now that in-wheel motors are finding increasingly utilization in new intelligent vehicles, the need for high precision measurement and control of the wheel forces is becoming more important than ever [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%