2009
DOI: 10.4018/jdcf.2009070104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Near Duplicate Image Matching for Digital Image Forensics

Abstract: Local invariant key point extraction has recently emerged as an attractive approach for detecting near duplicate images. Near duplicate images can be: (i) perceptually identical images (e.g. allowing for change in color balance, change in brightness, compression artifacts, contrast adjustment, rotation, cropping, filtering, scaling etc.), (ii) images of the same 3D scene (from different viewpoints). The requirements for identifying near duplicate images vary according to the application. In this paper we focus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A feature is considered as matched with another feature when the distance to that feature is less than a specific fraction of the distance to the next nearest feature. Further spatial topology is verified by Angle -Line Ratio (ALR) statistics [15] among the matched feature distributions. This ensures that we reduce the number of false matches.…”
Section: Experimental Results:-mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A feature is considered as matched with another feature when the distance to that feature is less than a specific fraction of the distance to the next nearest feature. Further spatial topology is verified by Angle -Line Ratio (ALR) statistics [15] among the matched feature distributions. This ensures that we reduce the number of false matches.…”
Section: Experimental Results:-mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Performance improvement is found due to obtaining CNN for all selected local blocks as well as global (entire image). In order to measure performance of our model, mean average precision (mAP) is used and is calculated as shown in (4) where ri , N and M represents rank of i th retrieved image, number of relevant images and total number of queries respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining near duplicates is a subjective matter. Detection of near duplicates has found many applications including copyright infringements [3], digital forgery [4], fraud detection [5], etc. Retrieving non identical images is found to be difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A feature is considered as matched with another feature when the distance to that feature is less than a specific fraction of the distance to the next nearest feature. Further spatial topology is verified by Angle-Line Ratio (ALR) statistics [10] among the matched feature distributions. This ensures that we reduce the number of false matches.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 95%