Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334) 2000
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2000.876919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust near-optimal output feedback control of nonlinear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods for robust output feedback controller design and controller-observer synthesizing for various classes of nonlinear systems, have been studied in a number of publications [28]- [30], [31]. An interesting approach for a robust near-optimal feedback controller design is also developed and applied to a chemical reactor in [32].…”
Section: Equation (17a) Is Then Reduced To the Lyapunov Matrix Equatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for robust output feedback controller design and controller-observer synthesizing for various classes of nonlinear systems, have been studied in a number of publications [28]- [30], [31]. An interesting approach for a robust near-optimal feedback controller design is also developed and applied to a chemical reactor in [32].…”
Section: Equation (17a) Is Then Reduced To the Lyapunov Matrix Equatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the optimum form of the observer model is considered to be the Kalman filter illustrated years earlier by R. E. Kalman, 3 where they considered the contributions of process and measurement uncertainties and adopted statistical tools to design a gain matrix for minimizing error covariance matrices. 4 Observer models for improvement of process control are very useful for achieving accuracy and processing efficiency, 5,6 especially for complex multivariate process systems like those found in manufacturing plants with multiple products, and biomolecular synthesis with multiple pathways and byproducts. For these kinds of process systems, accurate state measurements may be achieved by employing multiple sensors to measure process output.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For continuous‐time single‐input–single‐output nonlinear systems with time‐varying uncertainties, the inverse optimal control approach has also been used for output tracking . In the work of El‐Farra and Christofides, bounded and unbounded robust optimal state‐feedback control laws are proposed to enforce stability and robust asymptotic reference‐input tracking, in the presence of vanishing and nonvanishing uncertain variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work of El‐Farra and Christofides, bounded and unbounded robust optimal state‐feedback control laws are proposed to enforce stability and robust asymptotic reference‐input tracking, in the presence of vanishing and nonvanishing uncertain variables. Whereas in the other work of El‐Farra and Christofides, where the process states are assumed unmeasured and time‐varying, bounded uncertain variables are considered and robust near‐optimal output‐feedback controllers are synthesized through the combination of a high‐gain observer with a robust optimal state‐feedback controller to achieve exponential stability and asymptotic output tracking. In contrast to the former cases, the proposed unconstrained controller in the work of El‐Farra and Christofides is obtained by reshaping the scalar nonlinear gain of a Lyapunov‐based controller on Sontag's formula, which guarantees the global boundedness of the closed‐loop trajectories and robust asymptotic output tracking with an arbitrary degree of attenuation of the bounded nonvanishing uncertainty effect on the output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%