2009 Design, Automation &Amp; Test in Europe Conference &Amp; Exhibition 2009
DOI: 10.1109/date.2009.5090773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust non-preemptive hard real-time scheduling for clustered multicore platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it reorders the asynchronous kernel jobs in the Job Queue by keeping a partial order in the original VP. It is a non-preemptive, optimal scheduler augmented for job dependencies [14]. Second, it combines identical kernel requests in the Job Queue into one single kernel job, by using Kernel Coalescing, also discussed in Section 3.…”
Section: Gpu Multiplexing For Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it reorders the asynchronous kernel jobs in the Job Queue by keeping a partial order in the original VP. It is a non-preemptive, optimal scheduler augmented for job dependencies [14]. Second, it combines identical kernel requests in the Job Queue into one single kernel job, by using Kernel Coalescing, also discussed in Section 3.…”
Section: Gpu Multiplexing For Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adopted temporal model consists of a constraint based formulation of the STNU formalism 6 ; we rely on 6 With the restriction that the time bounds must be all non-negative. constraint propagation to enforce consistency.…”
Section: A the Time Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building over our previous work [6], [7], we leverage a hybrid off-line/on-line technique from the Project Scheduling domain, known as Precedence Constraint Posting (PCP) [8]. A schedule in PCP consists of a set of additional arcs in the task graph: this is implemented at run-time by delaying each task until all its predecessors (either natural or artificial) are over.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach to improve resource utilization is based on specifying lower and upper bounds on the execution time. With the help of precedence constraints, a robust schedule can also be constructed, which avoids possible scheduling anomalies [27].…”
Section: Case Studies and Current Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%