2000
DOI: 10.1364/oe.6.000075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust optical control of an optical-amplifier-based flip-flop

Abstract: We demonstrate new optical techniques for externally controlling the latchable output power of a semiconductor-optical-amplifier-based flip-flop. Optical 'set' and 'reset' signals increase and decrease the re-fractive index, respectively, via cross-phase modulation (XPM). Set signals, which deplete the carrier density, have wavelengths between 1533 and 1568 nm, and powers as low as 22 microW. Reset is performed with carrier-generating 'positive' optical pulses at 1306 and 1466 nm, and minimum powers below 1 mW… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though "incoherent" switching was obtained before in driven cavity or feedback systems (Maywar et al (2000); Schäpers et al (2000Schäpers et al ( , 2002; ; Pesch et al (2005); Barbay et al (2006)), the main route for control there is the phase of the WB with respect to the HB (and thus the CS) (Brambilla et al (1996); Spinelli et al (1998); Barland et al (2002); Hachair et al (2005)) leading to constructive or destructive interference and thus controlling locally the amplitude of the intra-cavity field. The insensitivity of the switching in CSL to phase is probably one of their major advantages in applications though it is probably fair to say that many aspects of the switching process and potentials for optimization are not well understood at this point (see also Sec.…”
Section: Experimental Investigations In Vcselsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though "incoherent" switching was obtained before in driven cavity or feedback systems (Maywar et al (2000); Schäpers et al (2000Schäpers et al ( , 2002; ; Pesch et al (2005); Barbay et al (2006)), the main route for control there is the phase of the WB with respect to the HB (and thus the CS) (Brambilla et al (1996); Spinelli et al (1998); Barland et al (2002); Hachair et al (2005)) leading to constructive or destructive interference and thus controlling locally the amplitude of the intra-cavity field. The insensitivity of the switching in CSL to phase is probably one of their major advantages in applications though it is probably fair to say that many aspects of the switching process and potentials for optimization are not well understood at this point (see also Sec.…”
Section: Experimental Investigations In Vcselsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently attention has focused on distributed feedback semiconductor optical amplifiers (DFBSOAs). Maywar et al demonstrated 1.3-1.55 |Jim wavelength conversion [15] and optical flipflop operation [16] under simultaneous injection of two optical signals at different wavelengths into a DFBSOA working in transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there are electrical and optical bias techniques used to shorten the effective carrier lifetime of SLA's down to 10 ps [17]. Hence, we expect that these techniques permit such devices to find applications in high-speed communications.…”
Section: Transient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%