2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2018.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust optimal control using conditional risk mappings in infinite horizon

Abstract: We use one-step conditional risk mappings to formulate a risk averse version of a total cost problem on a controlled Markov process in discrete time infinite horizon. The nonnegative one step costs are assumed to be lower semi-continuous but not necessarily bounded. We derive the conditions for the existence of the optimal strategies and solve the problem explicitly by giving the robust dynamic programming equations under very mild conditions. We further give an ǫ-optimal approximation to the solution and illu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows us to simplify expression (17) as Since x t ∈ X , t ∈ IN, and X is a compact set containing the origin, there exists an r ≥ 0 such that x 2 ≤ r. Therefore,…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows us to simplify expression (17) as Since x t ∈ X , t ∈ IN, and X is a compact set containing the origin, there exists an r ≥ 0 such that x 2 ≤ r. Therefore,…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• For s, t ∈ T with s ≤ t, let ρ s,t be the finite-horizon aggregated (or nested) risk mapping generated by ρ ( [5,14,15,20,21]; see also [2]): that is, ρ t,t (W t ) = ρ t (W t ) and…”
Section: Finite-horizon Risk-aware Optimal Switching Under General Fi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent works [5], [14], [37], and [41] also consider infinite horizon robust stochastic optimal control problems and follow a similar paradigm but use different underlying frameworks. More precisely, [14] and [41] assume a finite action and state space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%