2009
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.1554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust output feedback control against disturbance filter uncertainty described by dynamic integral quadratic constraints

Abstract: SUMMARYMotivated by a robust disturbance rejection problem, in which disturbances are described by an uncertain filter at the plant input, a convex solution is presented for the robust output feedback controller synthesis problem for a particularly structured plant. The uncertainties are characterized by an integral quadratic constraint (IQC) with general frequency-dependent multipliers. By exploiting the structure of the generalized plant, linear matrix inequality (LMI)-synthesis conditions are derived in ord… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then all eigenvalues of double-struckA are strictly inside the unit circle if ][X11X12X13X14false(false)X22XψX23X24false(false)false(false)X33X34false(false)false(false)false(false)X440where double-struckX is partitioned according to the dimensions of A ϕ , A ψ 1 , A ψ 3 and A. Proof The equivalence between (4) and LMI (9) follows the well‐known Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov lemma, and so does the equivalence between (3) and LMI (10). The spectrum characterisation of double-struckA is the discrete‐time counterpart of Theorem 4 of [27], the proof of which follows exactly the same line of arguments. □…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then all eigenvalues of double-struckA are strictly inside the unit circle if ][X11X12X13X14false(false)X22XψX23X24false(false)false(false)X33X34false(false)false(false)false(false)X440where double-struckX is partitioned according to the dimensions of A ϕ , A ψ 1 , A ψ 3 and A. Proof The equivalence between (4) and LMI (9) follows the well‐known Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov lemma, and so does the equivalence between (3) and LMI (10). The spectrum characterisation of double-struckA is the discrete‐time counterpart of Theorem 4 of [27], the proof of which follows exactly the same line of arguments. □…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The spectrum characterisation of A is the discrete-time counterpart of Theorem 4 of [27], the proof of which follows exactly the same line of arguments.…”
Section: (3) Holds If and Only If There Existsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A common practice is to maximize the inherited robustness of a controller by careful parameter design and tuning [5], [6]. Further robustness improvement can be achieved via advanced techniques such as nonlinear control [7]- [9], H ∞ or optimized loop-shaping robust control [10]- [12], and adaptive intelligent control [13], [14]. A more attractive approach distinguished from the aforementioned comes with the concept of unknown-input estimation, which brings disturbance rejection to a higher level, as demonstrated by various industrial applications [15]- [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luckily though, robust controller synthesis (in the presence of unmeasurable parameters) can be rendered convex in a number of specific cases and typically by admitting to some unknown degree of conservatism. In particular, one can perform robust syntheses based on LMI optimization in the cases of static state feedback [19], dynamic disturbance feedforward [7], [23], [5], [3], [12], output filtering/estimation [13], [6], [1], [25], [22] and dynamic output feedback with uncertainty solely in the disturbance filter [4], [11]. From a technical point of view, it is the specific structure that makes robust synthesis possible for a particular problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%