2020
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1740344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust parameter design based on Gaussian process with model uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feng et al 20 tackled the issue of building a response surface model based on input-output data obtained from a computer simulation, which might introduce some uncertainty in the optimal solutions due to the simplification of the real physical system. They employed a robust Gaussian process model to account for the uncertainty and used the Gibbs sampling method to formulate the final optimization problem that minimizes the quality loss function.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feng et al 20 tackled the issue of building a response surface model based on input-output data obtained from a computer simulation, which might introduce some uncertainty in the optimal solutions due to the simplification of the real physical system. They employed a robust Gaussian process model to account for the uncertainty and used the Gibbs sampling method to formulate the final optimization problem that minimizes the quality loss function.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 The purpose of RD is to select the opportune input settings to minimize the variability of an output response, while minimizing the bias between the response mean and the specific target. 4,5 The RBD is to make output responses to satisfy the reliability constraints by selecting the control variables. 6 Quality loss (QL) and failure risk cost (RC) can be used to evaluate the robustness and reliability of optimization results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust design (RD) and reliability‐based design (RBD) are effective tools to realize continuous quality improvement and improve product competitiveness 2,3 . The purpose of RD is to select the opportune input settings to minimize the variability of an output response, while minimizing the bias between the response mean and the specific target 4,5 . The RBD is to make output responses to satisfy the reliability constraints by selecting the control variables 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the CPS control system is designed and modeled by extensive simulation, tuning methods need to be expanded to address uncertainty and random disturbances in the system. In addition, ignoring the impact of uncertainty on the optimization model, the obtained optimal results may be far from the true optimum settings [ 32 ]. One of the main features in a reliable CPS design is the stability feature (robustness), which means no matter how the environment generates noise and uncertain factors, the control system should always reach a stable decision result eventually [ 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%