Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) Held Jointly With 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2009.5399799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust periodic reference tracking for uncertain linear systems subject to control saturations

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of tracking periodic references for uncertain linear systems subject to control saturation. Accordingly to the internal model principle, a control loop containing the modes of both the references and additive disturbances is considered. From this structure, conditions in a "quasi" LMI form are proposed to simultaneously compute a stabilizing state feedback gain and an anti-windup gain. Provided that the references and disturbances belong to a certain admissible set, these gains… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the maximum values of reference/disturbances must be admissible, i.e., the saturation limits should not be violated in steady-state. To address these issues, it is proposed an ultimate boundedness framework based on the following sets (Flores et al, 2009): a set of initial conditions Z 0 ; a set of admissible references/disturbances signals Q 0 and a positively invariant terminal set J 0 ⊂ Z 0 included in the closed-loop linearity region S(F, u 0 ) {z ∈ R n+nc ; |F z| ≤ u 0 }. Hence, since inside J 0 the closed-loop system is linear, then the tracking/rejection is ultimately guaranteed by the IMP.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the maximum values of reference/disturbances must be admissible, i.e., the saturation limits should not be violated in steady-state. To address these issues, it is proposed an ultimate boundedness framework based on the following sets (Flores et al, 2009): a set of initial conditions Z 0 ; a set of admissible references/disturbances signals Q 0 and a positively invariant terminal set J 0 ⊂ Z 0 included in the closed-loop linearity region S(F, u 0 ) {z ∈ R n+nc ; |F z| ≤ u 0 }. Hence, since inside J 0 the closed-loop system is linear, then the tracking/rejection is ultimately guaranteed by the IMP.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, restrictions on the allowable control signal can significantly deteriorate transient performance, in the phenomenon of windup (Tarbouriech and Turner, 2009), or even lead the closed-loop system to instability. In terms of steady-state tracking performance, saturation imposes constraints on the amplitude of references/disturbances signals and initial conditions for which the tracking/rejection is guaranteed (Flores et al, 2009). Regarding IMP based controllers able to deal with tracking/rejection of periodic signals taking into account small frequency variation and input saturation we can cite (Ramos and Costa-Castelló, 2013) and (Flores and Flores, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the designer must be aware that some reference signals can lead to trajectories that do not ensure the perfect tracking/rejection or can even lead to divergent trajectories. These particular issues are in part addressed in [18]- [20] for constant references, and [21], [22] for time-varying references. Regarding the repetitive control in the presence of constraints and anti-windup design we can cite [23], where the periodic nature of the steady state in the presence of constraints is ensured by an iterative Picard process and then an anti-windup controller is synthesized in order to recover the closed-loop performance under saturation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of constraints, the designer must be aware that some reference signals can lead to trajectories that does not ensure the perfect tracking/rejection or can even lead to divergent trajectories. These particular issues are in part addressed in [11], [12] and [13] for constant references, and [14] and [5] for time-varying references. Regarding the repetitive control in the presence of constraints and antiwindup design we can cite [15], where the periodic nature of the steady state in the presence of constraints is ensured by an iterative Picard process and then an anti-windup controller is synthetised in order to recover the closed-loop performance under saturation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the problem of periodic reference tracking, the sinusoidal internal model is commonly used in the so called resonant approach, to ensure the sinusoidal tracking in power converters [3], [4]. Also, this sinusoidal model can be used to describe any periodic reference as a sum of sinusoids, at the expense of high order controllers [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%