2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2018.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust pole placement under structural constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Confining the closed-loop poles to this region ensures that the damping ratio lies in [cos 1], the decay rate lies in [ab]. The region (14) can be characterized as the following corollary.…”
Section: Corollary 2 the Linear Stochastic Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confining the closed-loop poles to this region ensures that the damping ratio lies in [cos 1], the decay rate lies in [ab]. The region (14) can be characterized as the following corollary.…”
Section: Corollary 2 the Linear Stochastic Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, there are also requirements other than stability on the closed loop system's overall performance. The closed loop dynamic behaviour is determined by system poles (eigenvalues of a system matrix), therefore pole placement belongs to widely used controller design methods also studied in the robust control framework [5][6][7][8][9]. The corresponding controller then guarantees that the closed loop system poles have the predetermined values, thus shaping the closed loop system dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though a vast amount of literature has been devoted to robust control and control algorithm design, e.g., References [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], and various approaches have been developed both in frequency domain and in state space, there still remain open questions in this field. The important issue is computational tractability which also motivated linear matrix inequality (LMI) problem formulation and the use of the corresponding computationally efficient techniques that enable solving a large set of convex problems in a polynomial time (see, e.g., Reference [1]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nota-se, que uma desvantagem das técnicas de controlé otimo com alocação de autovaloresé a não consideração de incertezas nos modelos obtidos, fazendo com que o critério multiobjetivo não seja satisfeito. Uma solução para esse problema são as técnicas de alocação robusta de autovalores, podendo-se destacar Le and Wang (2014) e dos Santos et al (2018). Estas técnicas apresentam grande vantagem combinadas com controleótimo, pois o critério multiobjetivoé satisfeito mesmo na presença de incertezas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified