2013
DOI: 10.1057/jam.2013.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust portfolio optimization with Value-at-Risk-adjusted Sharpe ratios

Abstract: We propose a robust portfolio optimization approach based on Value-at-Risk (VaR) adjusted Sharpe ratios. Traditional Sharpe ratio estimates using a limited series of historical returns are subject to estimation errors. Portfolio optimization based on traditional Sharpe ratios ignores this uncertainty and, as a result, is not robust. In this paper, we propose a robust portfolio optimization model that selects the portfolio with the largest worse-case-scenario Sharpe ratio within a given confidence interval. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study [16] utilized semi-variance to assess portfolio risk, while still another study [17] utilized the downside risk. Some studies [18]- [23] used Value at Risk (VaR) to adjust the risk in the Sharpe ratio, which assesses risk via the probabilities of losing money. In order to improve VaR, some studies [24]- [26] employed the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) model to assess risk.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study [16] utilized semi-variance to assess portfolio risk, while still another study [17] utilized the downside risk. Some studies [18]- [23] used Value at Risk (VaR) to adjust the risk in the Sharpe ratio, which assesses risk via the probabilities of losing money. In order to improve VaR, some studies [24]- [26] employed the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) model to assess risk.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GNQTS uses the quantum not gate to inverse the Q-matrix probability, which can help GNQTS to jump out of the local optima. When the global-best solution has incompatible preference with the probability of the Q-matrix, then the quantum not-gate is applied to inverse the probability, as shown in Equation (18). Equation (19) shows the quantum not-gate applied to inverse the probability of the Q-matrix; for example, when the Q-matrix has higher probability tend to select 1, the global-best solution is 0, and the quantum notgate applies the process, as shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: ) Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bailey and de Prado (2012) consider the probabilistic Sharpe ratio measuring the probability that the ratio of excess return to standard deviation exceeds a certain value. Deng et al (2013) propose the VaR-adjusted Sharpe ratio measure to construct a portfolio with the largest worstcase scenario Sharpe ratio within a given confidence interval. They show that the original Sharpe ratio and the probabilistic Sharpe ratio are both special cases of the VaR-adjusted Sharpe ratio.…”
Section: Risk-adjusted Return Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should also mention Sharpe ratio model which is applied by construction of only one evaluation function that models the whole problem formulation. This model uses information from mean and variance of the assets when evaluating investments [16].…”
Section: Portfolio Optimization Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%