2018
DOI: 10.1109/tec.2017.2744980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Predictive Control for Direct-Driven Surface-Mounted Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Generators Without Mechanical Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to improve the robustness against the parameter perturbation, a composite integral terminal SMO is designed. Taking Substituting (17) into (16), the cost function is written as:…”
Section: Design Of the Rnpccmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to improve the robustness against the parameter perturbation, a composite integral terminal SMO is designed. Taking Substituting (17) into (16), the cost function is written as:…”
Section: Design Of the Rnpccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15], a composite predictive control method based on stator current and a disturbance observer is developed, which can achieve perfect current control performance of the PMSM with model parameter mismatch. In [16], a simple disturbance observer is designed to increase the robustness of the proposed deadbeat predictive control algorithm against parameter uncertainties of the Permanent Magnetic Synchronous Generator (PMSG). In [17], a robust fault-tolerant predictive current control algorithm is proposed based on a composite observer, which can enhance robustness against parameter perturbation and permanent magnet demagnetization by adding compensation voltage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of speed and position estimation methods have been proposed for permanent-magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) and induction machines (IMs), and recently they were applied successfully to SMPMSGs/DFIGs. The well-known observers in the literature include the following: phase-locked loop (PLL) [13][14][15], model reference adaptive system (MRAS) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], sliding-mode observers [23][24][25], extended Kalman filter (EKF) [26][27][28], unscented Kalman filter (UKF) [29][30][31], and others. Due to the simplicity, ease of implementation, and direct physical interpretation, MRAS-based observers have received increased interest from researchers and engineers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since predictive control is based on a system model, its performance strongly depends on the model parameter accuracy [13][14][15][16], and for PMSMs especially on the rotor flux [17]. High temperatures and currents, operating under strong field-weakening conditions, mechanical stresses, magnet cracks and mechanical imperfections may cause (partial) demagnetization [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%