2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1570-8659(08)00002-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Preferences and Robust Portfolio Choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Below we focus directly on their static counterparts. For more details we refer, e.g., to Schied et al (2009) or Föllmer and Schied (2016). In addition, to ensure that all our problems are well defined, we assume throughout that X consists of P-bounded random variables.…”
Section: Adjusting Es Via Benchmark Es Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below we focus directly on their static counterparts. For more details we refer, e.g., to Schied et al (2009) or Föllmer and Schied (2016). In addition, to ensure that all our problems are well defined, we assume throughout that X consists of P-bounded random variables.…”
Section: Adjusting Es Via Benchmark Es Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robust approach assumes that the modeler surrounds an approximating model by introducing a family of "neighborhood" models via perturbations. Schied et al [24] gave a good survey on the theory of robust preferences and robust portfolio selection. Particularly, Schied et al [24] considered a dynamic version of model uncertainty, where the uncertain drift of the risky asset price process was assumed to be stochastic and time-dependent.…”
Section: Yang Shen and Tak Kuen Siumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schied et al [24] gave a good survey on the theory of robust preferences and robust portfolio selection. Particularly, Schied et al [24] considered a dynamic version of model uncertainty, where the uncertain drift of the risky asset price process was assumed to be stochastic and time-dependent. For a systematic account of robustness and model uncertainty in economic modeling, one may also refer to Hansen and Sargent [12].…”
Section: Yang Shen and Tak Kuen Siumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, "≪" denotes the absolute continuity and Q denotes the true transition kernel of the underlying MCP, while γ 1 and γ 2 control the degree of variation between the estimated transition kernel and its true model. In particular, if γ 1 = 0, it becomes the average value at risk (see [40,44] and references therein). It is also notable that each concave and homogeneous valuation function has one dual representation of the form (9) under some regularity conditions for the set P (see e.g.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%