2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34992-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Privacy-Preserving Gossip Averaging

Abstract: Decentralized solutions are emerging as promising candidates to overcome the privacy risks associated with centralized data services. Such solutions suffer however from their own range of privacy vulnerabilities, arising from untrusted and malicious peers. In this paper, we consider the emblematic problem of privacy-preserving decentralized averaging, and propose a novel gossip protocol that exchanges noise for several rounds before starting to exchange actual data. This makes it hard for an honest but curious… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One notable approach is proposed in [25], where each node decomposes its state into two sub-states to guarantee privacy in average consensus. The additive-noise strategy presented in [26] exchanges noise for several rounds before exchanging data to ensure robustness, but it is only partially immune to attacks. Another interesting protection mechanism is digital watermarking [27], which can be used to protect signals from unauthorized access, copying, and distribution.…”
Section: A State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One notable approach is proposed in [25], where each node decomposes its state into two sub-states to guarantee privacy in average consensus. The additive-noise strategy presented in [26] exchanges noise for several rounds before exchanging data to ensure robustness, but it is only partially immune to attacks. Another interesting protection mechanism is digital watermarking [27], which can be used to protect signals from unauthorized access, copying, and distribution.…”
Section: A State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first averages all the elements of a set of vectors, the second averages predefined coordinates (second parameter) of the vectors from a set (first parameter). In a decentralized setup, these functions can be implemented with a gossip-based averaging protocol [JMB05], or with a private one [BFT19] for improved privacy protection. It is also possible to implement these primitives on a central server, to which peers send their models for averaging, in a federated, rather than decentralized, setup.…”
Section: Ii3b Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, peers will never get to see any part of another peer's model with a centralized implementation. When implementing the method using gossip averaging, a private gossip averaging protocol, like the one proposed in [BFT19], can be used.…”
Section: Ii5 Privacymentioning
confidence: 99%