2017
DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.8.238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust procedure for creating and characterizing the atomic structure of scanning tunneling microscope tips

Abstract: Scanning tunneling microscopes (STM) are used extensively for studying and manipulating matter at the atomic scale. In spite of the critical role of the STM tip, procedures for controlling the atomic-scale shape of STM tips have not been rigorously justified. Here, we present a method for preparing tips in situ while ensuring the crystalline structure and a reproducibly prepared tip structure up to the second atomic layer. We demonstrate a controlled evolution of such tips starting from undefined tip shapes.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As before, performance was verified by iteratively predicting additional lines of the i images in the holdout set and calculating the cumulative predictions using equation (2). This is shown in figure 6.…”
Section: Individual Linescan Windows and Cumulative Averagesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As before, performance was verified by iteratively predicting additional lines of the i images in the holdout set and calculating the cumulative predictions using equation (2). This is shown in figure 6.…”
Section: Individual Linescan Windows and Cumulative Averagesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This window could then be iteratively rolled while an image is being generated. We therefore modify equation (2), and use cumulative averaging to make predictions after each successive linescan from j=W+1 to j=N…”
Section: Multiple Linescan Windows and Lstmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Machine learning offers the opportunity for a distinctive and disruptive departure from the type of experimental (and, indeed, theoretical) methodologies that have formed the bedrock of the field of scanning probe microscopy ever since its inception in the eighties [15,16]. Almost forty years since the invention of the technique, it is still the case that the patience of the experimentalist remains the key parameter in cajoling the apex of the tip into yielding (sub)molecular or (sub)atomic [17][18][19] resolution. Even then, unless an 'inverse imaging' [20][21][22] strategy is adopted, the atomistic structure of the apex remains unknown.…”
Section: Taking the Pain Out Of Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use standard tip cleaning procedures, such as voltage pulsing up to −3 V and mechanical annealing [6]. The latter procedure consists of repeated and controlled indentation of the tip into the surface up to several conductance quanta and leads to a crystalline, atomically sharp tip apex [7]. Figure 2(e) shows a typical STM image (99 × 99 nm) of the reconstructed Au(111) surface obtained with the fabricated tip (setup conditions 100 mV, 300 pA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%