2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2006.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust regression for high throughput drug screening

Abstract: Effective analysis of high throughput screening (HTS) data requires automation of dose-response curve fitting for large numbers of datasets. Datasets with outliers are not handled well by standard non-linear least squares methods, and manual outlier removal after visual inspection is tedious and potentially biased. We propose robust non-linear regression via M-estimation as a statistical technique for automated implementation. The approach of finding M-estimates by Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares (IRLS) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several alternative but mathematically equivalent expressions are in practical use. 4,5,10 We have performed Monte Carlo simulation experiments that were designed to obtain a better quantitative understanding of the expected correlation between inhibition values at some constant concentration and the experimentally derived IC 50 values from the same experiment (within-curve correlation) and also from independently performed experiments. The latter will mirror the situation encountered when comparing single data point primary screening results with the corresponding IC 50 determinations based on different stock solutions or fresh solutions prepared from powder.…”
Section: The Four-parameter Hill Equation and The Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several alternative but mathematically equivalent expressions are in practical use. 4,5,10 We have performed Monte Carlo simulation experiments that were designed to obtain a better quantitative understanding of the expected correlation between inhibition values at some constant concentration and the experimentally derived IC 50 values from the same experiment (within-curve correlation) and also from independently performed experiments. The latter will mirror the situation encountered when comparing single data point primary screening results with the corresponding IC 50 determinations based on different stock solutions or fresh solutions prepared from powder.…”
Section: The Four-parameter Hill Equation and The Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In a second step, the primary hits (i.e., the compounds passing a fixed threshold or having a larger than 3-6 standard deviation distance from the zero effect level) are selected for concentration-response curve (CRC) validation experiments. 2,3 The determination of an IC 50 ("potency") value is based on fitting the four-parameter logistic Hill equation 4,5 to the data, although more sophisticated models are sometimes used in detailed pharmacological investigations. 6 The basic assumption of this stepwise HTS design is a reasonable correlation between the percent inhibition and IC 50 values, as can be expected from the Hill equation for ideal inhibitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…associations between the Val 158 Met polymorphism in COMT, gait velocity and Executive Attention were examined with linear or robust regression (Fomenko, Durst, & Balaban, 2006;Motulsky & Brown, 2006) as appropriate. To elucidate the associations between the COMT genotype and the outcome variables, gait velocity and Executive Attention were dichotomized to the best performance quartile vs. the remaining lower three quartiles.…”
Section: 3a Associations Between Comt Genotypes and Outcomes-contmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fomenko et al [4] proposed a nonlinear robust prediction based on the M-estimation, where the method needs a specific nonlinear regression model in advance. In many situations, however, an appropriate nonlinear regression model for a set of data is unknown in advance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M-estimation can be considered as a modification of both regression based on OLS and maximum likelihood estimation that eliminate the effects of outlying observation on the regression estimation. In the meantime, Fomenko [4] proposed a nonlinear robust prediction based on M-estimation by specifying a nonlinear regression model in advance. In many situations, however, an appropriate nonlinear regression model for a set of data is unknown in advance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%