2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10248905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Resonant Controllers for Distributed Energy Resources in Microgrids

Abstract: Motivated by the problem of different types and variations of load in micro-grids, this paper presents robust proportional-resonant controllers with a harmonics compensator based on the internal model principle. These controllers ensure robust tracking of sinusoidal reference signals in distributed energy resource systems subject to load variation with respect to sinusoidal disturbances. The distributed generation resource and the resonant controllers are described using the augmented state system approach, al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed controller is used for one distributed generator in order to improve voltage waveform, system stability, disturbance rejection (i.e., rejection capability to switch harmonics and harmonics caused by nonlinear loads), dynamic performances, and robustness under parameter uncertainty. Given the critical importance of the loads, international standards (ANSI/IEEE, 1986; IEC, 2011) [38,39] govern the performance of Distributed Energy Resources (DER), establishing criteria for both transient and steady-state operations. In transient conditions, adherence to standards necessitates minimal fluctuations in the output voltage amplitude and swift recovery times when loads are introduced or removed from the system.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed controller is used for one distributed generator in order to improve voltage waveform, system stability, disturbance rejection (i.e., rejection capability to switch harmonics and harmonics caused by nonlinear loads), dynamic performances, and robustness under parameter uncertainty. Given the critical importance of the loads, international standards (ANSI/IEEE, 1986; IEC, 2011) [38,39] govern the performance of Distributed Energy Resources (DER), establishing criteria for both transient and steady-state operations. In transient conditions, adherence to standards necessitates minimal fluctuations in the output voltage amplitude and swift recovery times when loads are introduced or removed from the system.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation parameters are provided in Tables 1 and 2 [39]. The desired DER output voltage is a sine wave signal with a nominal frequency of 60 Hz and an RMS value equal to 127 V. The performance assessment of the proposed control structure is carried out using Matla/Simulink platform.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bouzid et al in [6], addressed the issues of microgrids stability and performance optimization for different types of loads, including the problem of harmonic cancellation and output voltage disturbance mitigation of distributed generation resource systems caused by nonlinear loads. In this context, robust proportional-resonant controllers with a harmonics compensator based on the internal model principle have been proposed.…”
Section: Special Issue Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous-time transfer function of an ideal resonant controller is G res (s) = s 2 s 2 +ω 2 , where ω is the frequency of the sinusoidal reference to be tracked. The poles of G res (s), ±jω equal the poles of the Laplace transform of a sinusoidal signal [23]. As a result, a resonant converter satisfies the requirements of IMP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The poles of this new controller, called a quasi-resonant controller, are −ε ± √ ε 2 − ω 2 , which are different from those of the Laplace transform of a sinusoidal signal. Hence, quasi-resonant controllers have a steady-state tracking error as these controllers do not satisfy the requirements of IMP [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%