2000
DOI: 10.1080/07408170008963918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust scheduling of a two-machine flow shop with uncertain processing times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
97
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the scheduling instances that can be solved to guaranteed optimality remains limited but is comparable with the size of problems solvable by other combinatorial-optimization approaches to scheduling under uncertainty (see, e.g., Daniels and Carrillo 1997;Daniels and Kouvelis 1995;or Kouvelis et al 2000). An additional complication of the stability objective is the fact that optimal schedules need not (and generally will not) be active.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size of the scheduling instances that can be solved to guaranteed optimality remains limited but is comparable with the size of problems solvable by other combinatorial-optimization approaches to scheduling under uncertainty (see, e.g., Daniels and Carrillo 1997;Daniels and Kouvelis 1995;or Kouvelis et al 2000). An additional complication of the stability objective is the fact that optimal schedules need not (and generally will not) be active.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stochastic job duration D i is modelled by means of discrete scenarios, a choice that was also made by, e.g., Daniels and Carrillo (1997), Daniels and Kouvelis (1995), Kouvelis and Yu (1997), and Kouvelis et al (2000). Specifically, let a random variable L i denote the increase in d i if i is 'disrupted', which takes place with probability π i ; D i equals the baseline duration d i with probability (1 − π i ).…”
Section: Definitions and Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, robustness can be provided by forcing a schedule to fulfill a bunch of scenarios, sampled according to expected realizations of the uncertainty. Searching for a single schedule for all scenarios is often used in the robust literature [9]. However, a less conservative option is using a multi-stage stochastic optimization [16], which benefits from the assumption that the uncertainty can be measured in the short future, so decisions could be adapted accordingly.…”
Section: Center For Advanced Process Systems Engineering (Capse) Intmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kouvelis et al (2000) and Kasperski et al (2012) considered a min-max regret version of the two-machine flow shop scheduling problem with uncertain processing times, using the makespan as the performance measure of interest. Kouvelis et al (2000) proved NP-hardness and developed exact and heuristic methods. Kasperski et al (2008) showed strong NP-hardness and established approximability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let where * s σ is a schedule to minimize the makespan under scenario s. Since this problem is known to be NP-hard (Kouvelis and Daniels, 2000), however, we consider the problem satisfying ordered properties, defined as follows: Under each scenario q can be interpreted as the time associated with machine i, such as in setting or fine-tuning the machine. In this case, processing jobs can start after machine set-up is completed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%