2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2018.8461895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Sequential Testing of Multiple Hypotheses in Distributed Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [51]- [53], we successfully proposed to use robust estimators to robustify sequential detectors for distributed sensor networks. We applied the same concept to the distributed D-PPHDF.…”
Section: Simulation Ii: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [51]- [53], we successfully proposed to use robust estimators to robustify sequential detectors for distributed sensor networks. We applied the same concept to the distributed D-PPHDF.…”
Section: Simulation Ii: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of procedure is known as mulitple testing or mulitple comparison and has been studied extensively in the literature; see [171]- [179] and the references therein. A particularly attractive implementation of a detector based on this approach is the sequential matrix likelihood/probability ratio test [180], whose robust version is based on separate pairs of least favorable distributions for each pairwise test [181], [182]. Sequential tests will be revisited in more detail shortly.…”
Section: B Characterizing Least Favorable Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothesis testing [30], [31], which can be considered as a promising solution for solving the main technical challenges of applying ML-based methods for radio map construction, is classified into Bayesian hypothesis testing (BHT) [32]- [35] and statistical hypothesis testing (SHT) [36]- [39]. In BHT, it is necessary to model the prior distribution based on a priori information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%