2016
DOI: 10.1002/nav.21697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust shortest path planning and semicontractive dynamic programming

Abstract: In this paper we consider shortest path problems in a directed graph where the transitions between nodes are subject to uncertainty. We use a minimax formulation, where the objective is to guarantee that a special destination state is reached with a minimum cost path under the worst possible instance of the uncertainty. Problems of this type arise, among others, in planning and pursuit-evasion contexts, and in model predictive control. Our analysis makes use of the recently developed theory of abstract semicon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(220 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, if the game is the discretization of a control system where player a wants to reach a target in minimum time and b represents a disturbance, the lower value models the case that the controller can observe the disturbance and design his control strategy accordingly. Therefore, the upper value is more appropriate for a worst-case analysis of this problem, and this is in fact the choice in [23,25], and [11].…”
Section: Remark 6 the Results Of This Section Can Be Adapted To The Umentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, if the game is the discretization of a control system where player a wants to reach a target in minimum time and b represents a disturbance, the lower value models the case that the controller can observe the disturbance and design his control strategy accordingly. Therefore, the upper value is more appropriate for a worst-case analysis of this problem, and this is in fact the choice in [23,25], and [11].…”
Section: Remark 6 the Results Of This Section Can Be Adapted To The Umentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(13), the solution W of the discrete Isaacs equation (11) Proof Under the assumption (13), the discrete Isaacs equation (11) coincides with the onestep dynamic programming principle (5) satisfied by V − . On the other hand, from (5), one gets the general dynamic programming principle (4) by induction, and therefore, the equality W = V − .…”
Section: Discretization Of Differential Gamesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations