2014
DOI: 10.1364/oe.22.009471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust source and mask optimization compensating for mask topography effects in computational lithography

Abstract: Mask topography effects need to be taken into consideration for a more accurate solution of source mask optimization (SMO) in advanced optical lithography. However, rigorous 3D mask models generally involve intensive computation and conventional SMO fails to manipulate the mask-induced undesired phase errors that degrade the usable depth of focus (uDOF) and process yield. In this work, an optimization approach incorporating pupil wavefront aberrations into SMO procedure is developed as an alternative to maximi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional gradient-based methods of solving optimization problems, such as conjugate gradient (CG) [5,6], steepest descent (SD) [7], and gradient descent (GD) [8][9][10], have been used to solve the SMO problem. These methods are relatively efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional gradient-based methods of solving optimization problems, such as conjugate gradient (CG) [5,6], steepest descent (SD) [7], and gradient descent (GD) [8][9][10], have been used to solve the SMO problem. These methods are relatively efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gradient-based methods, as local search algorithms, have been generally applied in lithographic SO, such as gradient descent (GD) 10,11 , steepest descent (SD) 7 , conjugate gradient (CG) 12,13 . However, due to the complex gradient function for the resist model at advanced nodes, the optimization performance of gradient-based pixeled SO method is evidently limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of these algorithms can serve as guidelines for the investigation of 3D OPC. Examples of such algorithms are the conjugate gradient methods [32,33], the augmented Lagrangian methods [34], the compressive sensing methods [35,36], the semi-implicit methods [37,38], and the model-driven neural network methods [39,40]. Inspired by these algorithms, Peng et al simplified the derivatives as a matrix form and proposed the 3D OPC method based on 3D lithography [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%