2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1047/1/012015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust sparse linear regression for tokamak plasma boundary estimation using variational Bayes

Abstract: Abstract. Precise control of the shape of plasma in a tokamak requires reliable reconstruction of the plasma boundary. The problem of boundary estimation can be reduced to a simple linear regression with a potentially infinite amount of regressors. This regression problem poses some difficulties for classical methods. The selection of regressors significantly influences the reconstructed boundary. Also, the underlying model may not be valid during certain phases of the plasma discharge. Formal model structure … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the development of increasingly powerful high performance computing resources, machine learning (ML) techniques are becoming practical tools in model construction and large data exploitation. These tools open new exploratory options to address current issues in fusion plasma analysis and operation [1][2][3][4][5]. Specifically, the usage of neural networks (NNs) [6] as fast surrogate models has already been applied to plasma microturbulent transport calculations [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the development of increasingly powerful high performance computing resources, machine learning (ML) techniques are becoming practical tools in model construction and large data exploitation. These tools open new exploratory options to address current issues in fusion plasma analysis and operation [1][2][3][4][5]. Specifically, the usage of neural networks (NNs) [6] as fast surrogate models has already been applied to plasma microturbulent transport calculations [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference time, t = 0, in the JET data system is when the magnetic coils start ramping up, instead of the usual time of plasma breakdown. These two events are typically 40 s apart at JET 4. The particle transport options are only applicable when using the QLKNN model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active Learning is a sequential sampling strategy that queries an expensive black box function (in our case a gyrokinetic model) by means of an acquisition function that identifies regions where additional data would improve the NN performance. Contrary to Bayesian Optimisation approaches, which aim to perform sequential optimisation with only a few function evaluations (see for example [17,[27][28][29] for applications relevant to Fusion), Active Learning enables learning of the function to be approximated over the entire parameter space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%