1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1995.479288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust speech recognition based on stochastic matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stochastic Matching algorithm (Sankar and Lee, 1995) is the closest in spirit to the STAR algorithm when no stereo data are provided. Some of our solutions are identical to the ones provided by the stochastic matching algorithm.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Stochastic Matching algorithm (Sankar and Lee, 1995) is the closest in spirit to the STAR algorithm when no stereo data are provided. Some of our solutions are identical to the ones provided by the stochastic matching algorithm.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When particularized for data compensation these solutions can be directly compared to ®xed codeword-dependent cepstral normalization (FCDCN) (Acero, 1991). When particularized for HMM adaptation they can be compared to dual-channel codebook adaptation (DCCA) , maximum likelihood linear regression (MLLR) (Leggeter and Woodland, 1995), parallel model combination (PMC) (Gales, 1995), and stochastic matching (Sankar and Lee, 1995).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Secondly there is the possibility of adapting from sparse data, for which ML is unable to provide robust estimations, originally solved by using prior information in the training process (MAP, maximum a posteriori) [Chesta et al, 1999]. More frameworks have been proposed such as Cepstral mean normalization [Liu et al, 1993], stochastic matching [Sankar and Lee, 1995], vector field smoothing [Tonomura et al, 1995], but they are beyond the purpose of this research.…”
Section: Adaptation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%