1997
DOI: 10.3354/meps146001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust statistical modelling of hawksbill sea turtle growth rates (southern Great Barrier Reef)

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Growth rates recorded between 1974 and 1991 for 44 immature hawksbill sea turtles in the southern Great Barrier Reef foraging grounds were modelled using nonparametric regression methods. The implicit sampling design in this long-term mark-recapture program was mixed longitudinal and included growth records for both female and male hawksbills ranging between 39 and 85 cm CCL (curved carapace length). Distinct sex-speclfic growth patterns were found, with immature female hawksbills growing at ca 0.5 c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
66
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hawksbill sea turtles exhibit slow growth rates although they are known to vary within and among populations from a low of 0.4-1.2 in (1-3 cm) per year measured in the Indo-Pacific (Chaloupka and Limpus 1997;Mortimer et al 2003;Mortimer et al 2002;Whiting 2000) to a high of 2 in (5 cm) or more per year measured at some sites in the Caribbean (Díez and Dam 2002;León and Díez 1999). Differences in growth rates are likely due to differences in diet and/or density of sea turtles at foraging sites and overall time spent foraging (Bjorndal and Bolten 2000;Chaloupka et al 2004).…”
Section: Life History Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hawksbill sea turtles exhibit slow growth rates although they are known to vary within and among populations from a low of 0.4-1.2 in (1-3 cm) per year measured in the Indo-Pacific (Chaloupka and Limpus 1997;Mortimer et al 2003;Mortimer et al 2002;Whiting 2000) to a high of 2 in (5 cm) or more per year measured at some sites in the Caribbean (Díez and Dam 2002;León and Díez 1999). Differences in growth rates are likely due to differences in diet and/or density of sea turtles at foraging sites and overall time spent foraging (Bjorndal and Bolten 2000;Chaloupka et al 2004).…”
Section: Life History Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other habitat properties were not examined in these studies. Chaloupka & Limpus (1997) present growth curves based on data collected for 44 immature hawksbill turtles of the southern Great Barrier Reef. Growth rates in these Australian hawksbills exhibit a non-monotonic pattern, rising from 1.0 to 1.5 cm yr -1 at 40 cm SCL, peaking at 2.2 cm yr -1 (females) and 1.7 cm yr -1 (males) at 55 cm SCL, then gradually descending to negligible growth (reported curved carapace lengths converted to SCL using Table 1 in Limpus 1992).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Aggregationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partly in response to such difficulties, recent studies of marine turtle growth have used sophisticated, generalized additive modelling (GAM) approaches to determine growth curves and examine contributing factors, such as sex and year effects (e.g. Chaloupka & Limpus 1997, Bjorndal et al 2000. An important objective of these (and our) studies is to obtain representative growth curves (e.g.…”
Section: Growth Curve Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations