2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-020-02608-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Subsampling ANOVA Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of Water Resource and Environmental Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In aggregate, 784 subsamples were used to calculate the mean unbiased estimate of total uncertainty fractions (i.e., the averages obtained from all subsamples) attributable to each source (Figures 10B,C). It should be noted that the ANOVA is sensitive to the subsampling approaches (Wang et al, 2020); in this regard, the reader is referred to the Supplementary Material, Part G for further discussion. In all sites, the contribution of emission scenario uncertainty (alone) to total uncertainty is between 10 and 20%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aggregate, 784 subsamples were used to calculate the mean unbiased estimate of total uncertainty fractions (i.e., the averages obtained from all subsamples) attributable to each source (Figures 10B,C). It should be noted that the ANOVA is sensitive to the subsampling approaches (Wang et al, 2020); in this regard, the reader is referred to the Supplementary Material, Part G for further discussion. In all sites, the contribution of emission scenario uncertainty (alone) to total uncertainty is between 10 and 20%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty exists in the climate model, the greenhouse gas emission scenarios, and the population scenarios. As a powerful statistical tool, the main contribution (and their multidimensional interactions) of GCM, RCP, and SSP to the sources of uncertainty on population exposure projections can be quantified through the analysis (F. Wang et al., 2020). It has been commonly used in many fields, especially for the experimental aspect (Barros et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodology and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of the MK test is that as a nonparametric procedure it does not assume a specific joint distribution of the precipitation indices, which is minimally affected by departures from normality (Han et al, 2014). The limitations of this trend test are frequently associated with its own null hypothesis (H0), which assumes that the precipitation indices are independently and identically distributed (Wang et al, 2020). More details about MK test are available in (Blain, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%