2011
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0152-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust tests for multivariate factorial designs under heteroscedasticity

Abstract: The question of how to analyze several multivariate normal mean vectors when normality and covariance homogeneity assumptions are violated is considered in this article. For the two-way MANOVA layout, we address this problem adapting results presented by Brunner, Dette, and Munk (BDM; 1997) and Vallejo and Ato (modified Brown-Forsythe [MBF]; 2006) in the context of univariate factorial and split-plot designs and a multivariate version of the linear model (MLM) to accommodate heterogeneous data. Furthermore, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the distribution was not normal (Table 1), the literature supports that with very large samples, such as this case, the analysis of variance can be used without restriction [48][49][50][51]. However, for further verification, the Box's M and Wilks' Lambda tests [52][53][54][55] were conducted, resulting in rejection of the null hypothesis (<0.05), which confirms the use of a parametric analysis [56,57]. In order to study the relationships between the variables as proposed in the second of our research objectives, a multilevel analysis was conducted to make several comparisons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the distribution was not normal (Table 1), the literature supports that with very large samples, such as this case, the analysis of variance can be used without restriction [48][49][50][51]. However, for further verification, the Box's M and Wilks' Lambda tests [52][53][54][55] were conducted, resulting in rejection of the null hypothesis (<0.05), which confirms the use of a parametric analysis [56,57]. In order to study the relationships between the variables as proposed in the second of our research objectives, a multilevel analysis was conducted to make several comparisons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypotheses referring to nullity and parallelism of the regression slopes were tested using SAS PROC MIXED with the solution proposed by Kenward and Roger ( 2009 ). PROC MIXED allows the use of a linear model that relaxes the assumption of constant variance (for details, see Vallejo et al, 2010 ; Vallejo and Ato, 2012 ). The post-hoc contrasts were done using the ESTIMATE expression in SAS PROC MIXED and the BH/FDR option in SAS PROC MULTITEST.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an extensive simulation study involving heterogeneous covariance matrices and nonnormal distributions, Vallejo and Ato [33] investigated the behavior of different small-sample approximations for multivariate tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%