2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-020-02618-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust transitivity of singular hyperbolic attractors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of Theorem 3.1 calls for the following topological description for Lorenz attractor, which strengthens the main result of [4].…”
Section: 1supporting
confidence: 75%
“…The proof of Theorem 3.1 calls for the following topological description for Lorenz attractor, which strengthens the main result of [4].…”
Section: 1supporting
confidence: 75%
“…The proofs of Theorems A and B use a construction of adapted cross-sections, generalizing that presented in the 3-flow setting in [8] and in the codimension 2 setting in [5], which has been used to prove many delicate statistical properties of these flows; a similar construction (but built in a different way) of higher-dimensional adapted cross-sections was recently proposed in [19]. This enables us to solve the basin problem as follows; see, for example, [13] for a similar but more delicate instance in a highly non-uniformly hyperbolic setting.…”
Section: Araujomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that when Λ is a Lorenz attractor of vector fields in a Baire residual subset R r ⊂ X r (M 3 ), (r ∈ N ≥2 ) or Λ is a singular hyperbolic attractor Λ of vector fields in a Baire residual set R ⊂ X 1 (M ), then Λ is a homoclinic class such that each pair of periodic orbits are homoclinically related (cf. [5, Theorem 6.8] for Lorenz attractors and [20,Theorem B] for singular hyperbolic attractors) and…”
Section: (Lower Bound) Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%