2010
DOI: 10.3109/00313025.2010.508794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust variables in texture analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of the fractal concept for image analysis has several advantages. The fractal dimension has shown to be robust against the segmentation process [63] . In routine cytological preparations fractal derived variables are much less dependent on staining variations than variables derived from the grey-level co-occurrence matrix [61] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the fractal concept for image analysis has several advantages. The fractal dimension has shown to be robust against the segmentation process [63] . In routine cytological preparations fractal derived variables are much less dependent on staining variations than variables derived from the grey-level co-occurrence matrix [61] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all these papers concerning the multifractality of biological signals are based on the hypothesis that the functionality and the evolution of tissues/cells/DNA are related to and measured by the evolving fractal geometry (complexity), so that malfunctions and pathologies can be linked with the degeneracy of the geometry during its evolution time [57, 1618]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined variables of geometric morphometry such as nuclear area, form factor, mean gray level, and standard deviation of gray values. We also calculated texture features derived from the co-occurrence matrix [17,27,28] and the fractal dimension (FD) according to Minkowski-Bouligand after pseudo-3D transformation [18,20], as well as its goodness of fit (R 2 ) [19,20,29]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques have been widely used in pathology and cytology for the differentiation of normal cells, benign and malignant tumors [15-17], as prognostic markers in malignancy [18-20] and in order to examine chromatin remodeling of cells in culture after incubation with carcinogens [21], hormones [22] and therapeutic agents [23,24]. Computerized image analysis has shown to be a fast and reliable way for quantitative morphologic analysis [10,18,19,25-28], and moreover, to be a possibility to detect subtle morphologic changes which cannot be recognized by conventional microscopy even by an expert.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%