2015
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2015.2421482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Vehicle Detection and Distance Estimation Under Challenging Lighting Conditions

Abstract: Avoiding high computational costs and calibration issues involved in stereo-vision-based algorithms, this paper proposes real-time monocular-vision-based techniques for simultaneous vehicle detection and inter-vehicle distance estimation, in which the performance and robustness of the system remain competitive, even for highly challenging benchmark datasets. This paper develops a collision warning system by detecting vehicles ahead and, by identifying safety distances to assist a distracted driver, prior to oc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Han et al proposed calculating the distance based on vehicle width estimated by using the lane line and considered the situation without the lane line, but there is a big error in estimating the width of the lane line and target vehicle [30]. Mehdi et al estimated the distance using the height and the pitch angle of the camera by assuming the road is flat, but this method does not consider lateral distance and the influence of camera attitude angles [31]. The above ranging methods have no length reference of a realistic target and rely solely on the imaging principle of the camera, which is challenging to achieve high robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al proposed calculating the distance based on vehicle width estimated by using the lane line and considered the situation without the lane line, but there is a big error in estimating the width of the lane line and target vehicle [30]. Mehdi et al estimated the distance using the height and the pitch angle of the camera by assuming the road is flat, but this method does not consider lateral distance and the influence of camera attitude angles [31]. The above ranging methods have no length reference of a realistic target and rely solely on the imaging principle of the camera, which is challenging to achieve high robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance estimation Many prior works for distance estimation mainly focused on building a model to represent the geometry relation between points on images and their corresponding physical distances on the real-world coordinate. One of the classic ways to estimate distance for given object (with a point or a bounding box in the image) was to convert the image point to the corresponding bird's-eye view coordinate using inverse perspective mapping (IPM) algorithm [28,25]. Due to the drawbacks of IPM, it would fail in cases that objects are located over 40 meters apart or on a curved road.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Feature-based methods Rezaei et al used chain coding to maintain the original accuracy in the process of taillight outline detection and analyze the geometric rules of the taillight outline. They used virtual symmetry detection technology to locate the taillight position [7]. Based on the cognitive theory, Weis et al decomposed a video input stream into color, shape and other features which are closely combined with an image model and created the pixel values of interest in taillight areas according to the characteristics of taillights and atmospheric effects caused by external lighting and weather conditions [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%