2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccvw.2015.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Visual Tracking by Exploiting the Historical Tracker Snapshots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 11, we observed that the target in the MotorRolling sequence flipped in plane, and the scale also changed dramatically over time. The STRCF [31] and ASRCF [11] both lost the target, while our approach can successfully track the target among most of the frames and obtain relative high AUC score. Furthermore, our tracker achieves promising performance and is on par with the ATOM tracker.…”
Section: Qualitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 11, we observed that the target in the MotorRolling sequence flipped in plane, and the scale also changed dramatically over time. The STRCF [31] and ASRCF [11] both lost the target, while our approach can successfully track the target among most of the frames and obtain relative high AUC score. Furthermore, our tracker achieves promising performance and is on par with the ATOM tracker.…”
Section: Qualitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(MEEM) restoration scheme to address the model drift problem. Li et al [31] extended the MEEM to multi-expert in a collaborative way, instead of the independent entropy computation in MEEM. Similarly, Li et al [32] utilized the unified discrete graph to model the relationship of multi-expert, while the computation load of dynamic programming increased significantly with a larger number of experts.…”
Section: Zhang Et Al Proposed a Ensemble Tracker Based On Multi-expert Entropy Minimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the correlation‐guided motion model can be represented as qifalse(Xtifalse(r+1false)falsefalse|Xtifalse(rfalse)false)={1em4pt1falsefalse|Ltifalsefalse|,ifthickmathspaceXtifalse(r+1false)Lti0,otherwise. In detail, the target candidate set is generated as follows: since the CF updates each frame, it is prone to drift as the tracking time goes by. Therefore, we preserve both the current CF and its historical tracker snapshots to constitute a CF ensemble [29, 30]. At each time step, the local maxima of the CF ensemble response maps are generated using non‐maxima suppression as the initial candidates.…”
Section: Multi‐object Tracking Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In detail, the target candidate set is generated as follows: since the CF updates each frame, it is prone to drift as the tracking time goes by. Therefore, we preserve both the current CF and its historical tracker snapshots to constitute a CF ensemble [29,30]. At each time step, the local maxima of the CF ensemble response maps are generated using non-maxima suppression as the initial candidates.…”
Section: Correlation-guided Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher update rates capture the rapid target changes but is prone to occlusions, whereas slower update paces provide a long memory for the tracker to handle temporal target variations but lack the flexibility to accommodate permanent target changes. To this end, researchers try to combine long-and short-term memories [62] and role-back improper updates [57] or utilize different temporal snapshots of the classifier to overcome non-stationary distribution of the target's appearance [63]. This pipeline, however, was altered in some studies to introduce desired properties, e.g., to avoid label noise by merging sampling and labeling steps [15].…”
Section: Estimatingmentioning
confidence: 99%