2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-016-1360-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust vulnerability analysis of nuclear facilities subject to external hazards

Abstract: Natural hazards have the potential to trigger complex chains of events in technological installations leading to disastrous effects for the surrounding population and environment. The threat of climate change of worsening extreme weather events exacerbates the need for new models and novel methodologies able to capture the complexity of the natural-technological interaction in intuitive frameworks suitable for an interdisciplinary field such as that of risk analysis. This study proposes a novel approach for th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the methodology adopted integrates the use of Credal Networks (CNs), which can be regarded as a generalization of BNs able to include imprecise probabilities in the framework, with cutting-edge and robust SRMs. The choice of this particular methodology is justified by its large potential in the representation of the interaction between weather events and technological installations, as proved in former studies [19] [20]. Indeed the approach allows to embody the aleatory character of natural events as well as the epistemic uncertainty associated (in particular in the case of climate projections), through the use of probabilistic models, intervals or imprecise random variables.…”
Section: Methodology and Computational Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the methodology adopted integrates the use of Credal Networks (CNs), which can be regarded as a generalization of BNs able to include imprecise probabilities in the framework, with cutting-edge and robust SRMs. The choice of this particular methodology is justified by its large potential in the representation of the interaction between weather events and technological installations, as proved in former studies [19] [20]. Indeed the approach allows to embody the aleatory character of natural events as well as the epistemic uncertainty associated (in particular in the case of climate projections), through the use of probabilistic models, intervals or imprecise random variables.…”
Section: Methodology and Computational Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the use of the information contained inside the CPTs as inputs in the joint distribution and, in combination with the Bayes' theorem, concede the capability of computing the posterior probability of any single or complex event modelled in the network. This process is known as belief updating or probabilistic inference and constitutes the warhorse of the predictive and diagnostic analyses as well as the what-if scenarios that can be produced with the Bayesian networks [16]. Further information about this matter will be treated later on section 2.3.…”
Section: Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of information that can be adopted in this method involves real probability values (discrete nodes) or Gaussian distribution functions. The latter works with crisp value probabilities (Tolo et al 2016b). However, this characteristic turns into the main drawback of this technique when the data comes in the way of continuous distributions.…”
Section: Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral shown in Eq. 6 is equivalent to that of a reliability problem (Tolo et al 2016b). Solving a structural reliability problem, i.e.…”
Section: Enhanced Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%