2012
DOI: 10.1080/09064710.2011.577443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness in the mineral supply from temporary grasslands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in agreement with the studies of (Lindstrom [30]) who reported that grass-legume mixture plots had higher micronutrient accumulation than monoculture grass plots. These findings are also in agreement with the study of (Hogh-Jansen and Soegaard [31]), who found higher micronutrient levels in grasslegume mixture plots than pure grass stands. Various legume species harvested from different plots also showed great differences in their microelement concentration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These findings are in agreement with the studies of (Lindstrom [30]) who reported that grass-legume mixture plots had higher micronutrient accumulation than monoculture grass plots. These findings are also in agreement with the study of (Hogh-Jansen and Soegaard [31]), who found higher micronutrient levels in grasslegume mixture plots than pure grass stands. Various legume species harvested from different plots also showed great differences in their microelement concentration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…(), Hejcman et al . () and Høgh‐Jensen and Søegaard () and as estimated by Whitehead (). However, the return of animal manure and urine (Bengtsson et al ., ) and use of macronutrient fertilizers (Bengtsson et al ., ; Hejcman et al ., ) will also replace micronutrients removed in conserved feed or by grazing animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative concentrations of different botanical groups can be compared and the relative trends in our data are similar to other studies. For example, Lindström et al [17] found Mn to also be highest in grasses and Co, Cu, Fe and Zn to be highest in legumes, while in the complete sward a decrease in the proportion of grass in favour of legumes and forbs is associated with an increase in mineral concentrations, with the exception of Mn [22,31,37]. These previous studies have predominantly been in Scandinavia or Australasia, and our data show that the same relationships between botanical groups occur, despite the use of different species and cultivars, and with different soils and climates.…”
Section: Inter-and Intra-botanical Group Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is difficult to make a comparison of mineral concentrations in plant species and botanical groups across different studies. Much of the available data on plant mineral concentrations are from Scandinavia [17,22,23], and it is unknown how applicable the data are elsewhere due to differences in plant cultivars, soils and climate. Furthermore, many of these studies overlook I and Se (despite these being some of the most deficient minerals in livestock systems), primarily due to the additional challenge of their more complex analysis compared to other minerals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%