2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.90.012316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of composite pulses to time-dependent control noise

Abstract: We study the performance of composite pulses in the presence of time-varying control noise on a single qubit. These protocols, originally devised only to correct for static, systematic errors, are shown to be robust to time-dependent non-Markovian noise in the control field up to frequencies as high as ∼10% of the Rabi frequency. Our study combines a generalized filter-function approach with asymptotic dc-limit calculations to give a simple analytic framework for error analysis applied to a number of composite… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
106
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prove that cancellation and filtering are inequivalent notions, with highorder cancellation in the Magnus sense not implying highorder filtering in general, and with both notions being a priori equally significant for assessing the control performance. Our results provide a firm foundation for recent analyses where this inequivalence has manifested in the context of compositepulse and Walsh-modulated protocols [13,15], as well as a new perspective on dynamical error control strategies, with potential implications for quantum fault tolerance.Control-theoretic setting.-We consider a general finitedimensional open quantum system S coupled to an uncontrollable environment (bath) B, whose free evolution is described by a joint Hamiltonian of the form H(t) = H S + H SB (t), with respect to the interaction picture associated to the physical bath Hamiltonian H B . Open-loop control is introduced via a time-dependent Hamiltonian H ctrl (t) acting on S alone, with the controlled dynamics being represented in terms of an intended plus error component, namely, H(t) + H ctrl (t) ≡ arXiv:1408.3836v2 [quant-ph]…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We prove that cancellation and filtering are inequivalent notions, with highorder cancellation in the Magnus sense not implying highorder filtering in general, and with both notions being a priori equally significant for assessing the control performance. Our results provide a firm foundation for recent analyses where this inequivalence has manifested in the context of compositepulse and Walsh-modulated protocols [13,15], as well as a new perspective on dynamical error control strategies, with potential implications for quantum fault tolerance.Control-theoretic setting.-We consider a general finitedimensional open quantum system S coupled to an uncontrollable environment (bath) B, whose free evolution is described by a joint Hamiltonian of the form H(t) = H S + H SB (t), with respect to the interaction picture associated to the physical bath Hamiltonian H B . Open-loop control is introduced via a time-dependent Hamiltonian H ctrl (t) acting on S alone, with the controlled dynamics being represented in terms of an intended plus error component, namely, H(t) + H ctrl (t) ≡ arXiv:1408.3836v2 [quant-ph]…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…the practical implication is that, in general, it is only meaningful to demand a high FO for a subset of the GFFs -e.g., those responsible for filtering the dominant noise contributions over a frequency range, that is, Φ [κ] large for some κ < ∞. Remarkably, within the validity of a first-order fidelity approximation, the distinction between CO and such "truncated" (κ = 2) FO has been already observed for well-known composite-pulse protocols [5]: e.g., so-called Solavay-Kitaev SK1 and Wimperis BB1 sequences for amplitude errors have same FO (= 1) despite being firstand second-order in the Magnus sense, respectively [13,15]. Likewise, Walsh-modulated logic gates with desired noisefiltering features against dephasing noise have been recently implemented in trapped-ion experiments [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Pulse optimization is common in NMR [17] and is also receiving increasing attention in quantum information [12,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In contrast to these previous approaches, our optimization is specifically tailored to the ST-qubit system and includes not only the relevant physical effects but also the most important hardware constraints and the effect of high-frequency nonMarkovian noise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamical decoupling (DD) is an active (or error correcting) scheme, based on the repeated application of control pulses designed to coherently average out unwanted interactions with the environment 17,18 . Improvement against 1/f noise in single-qubit gates via DD [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] , composite pulses [27][28][29][30] , dynamically corrected gates 30,31 and quantum optimal control 32,33 , has been demonstrated. In superconducting qubits pulsed control has been exploited to reduce dephasing due to charge-and magnetic fluxnoise 8,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%