2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2018.8619179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of Energy Landscape Control for Spin Networks Under Decoherence

Abstract: Quantum spin networks form a generic system to describe a range of quantum devices for quantum information processing and sensing applications. Understanding how to control them is essential to achieve devices with practical functionalities. Energy landscape shaping is a novel control paradigm to achieve selective transfer of excitations in a spin network with surprisingly strong robustness towards uncertainties in the Hamiltonians. Here we study the effect of decoherence, specifically generic pure dephasing, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, A and S are N 2 × N 2 matrices of rank ≤ N 2 − N with equality in the generic case. More specifically, A and S are simultaneously diagonalizable [5] by a complex unitary matrix U ,…”
Section: B Pure Dephasing As Perturbation Of Hamiltonian Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3, A and S are N 2 × N 2 matrices of rank ≤ N 2 − N with equality in the generic case. More specifically, A and S are simultaneously diagonalizable [5] by a complex unitary matrix U ,…”
Section: B Pure Dephasing As Perturbation Of Hamiltonian Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…II, we introduce in Sec. III a novel, general formalism that reduces robustness against all uncertainties to enforcing the single transmission Tz,w to be robust against Hamiltonian parameter uncertainties [4] and decoherence strength [5]. Preparation error response requires a different formulation departing from classical robust performance, as treated in [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in previous work [16] that these controllers have interesting robustness properties in that the differential sensitivity of the transfer fidelity for superoptimal controllers, i.e., controllers that achieve unit-fidelity transfer, vanishes, which runs counter to the trade-off between performance and robustness that is commonly seen for classical systems [15]. However, other work indicates that this performance advantage disappears in the presence of decoherence [14], [17]. Moreover, differential sensitivity gives no information how the system responds to larger perturbations over a prolonged period of time, or what the critical frequencies are.…”
Section: Controlled Spin Networkmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1. The heuristic approach s ≈ 0 has been attempted [5], [6], but proper treatment requires a modification of the matrix inversion lemma. Some matrix pseudo-inversion lemmas [2], [3] have been proposed but do not apply in this context because their application is restricted to symmetric matrices.…”
Section: Robust Performance In Open Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reviewing quantum dynamics in Sec. II, the general error dynamics with transfer matrix T z,w that should be robust against uncertainties in the Hamiltonian [4] and decoherence [5] is introduced in Sec. III.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%