2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28583-7_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of Self-Organizing Consensus Algorithms: Initial Results from a Simulation-Based Study

Abstract: Abstract. This short paper studies distributed consensus algorithms with focus on their robustness against communication errors. We report simulation results to verify and assess existing algorithms. GacsKurdyumov-Levin and simple majority rule are evaluated in terms of convergence rate and speed as a function of noise and network topology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work extends and complements previous investigations on binary majority consensus with stochastic elements [15,17,18,25,30,32] in terms of the robustness towards faulty node behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This work extends and complements previous investigations on binary majority consensus with stochastic elements [15,17,18,25,30,32] in terms of the robustness towards faulty node behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The cluster-breaking impact of randomization also contributes to the convergence rate in the systems without faulty nodes. This effect was earlier observed in [15,18,25] and can be explained as follows. Binary majority consensus is designed to provide a common decision for all nodes in the system, so the stable clusters of nodes sharing a different state inhibit the convergence.…”
Section: Faulty Nodes With Random and Persistent Failuresupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This can be partially explained by the randomization provided by communication errors and random topology, since some algorithms gain performance with randomization [Saks et al 1991;Aspnes 2002]. This motivated us to study the robustness of consensus in a larger range of system parameters (also see Gogolev and Bettstetter [2012]; Marcenaro [2014a, 2014b]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%