1968
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1968.11009285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of theF-Test to Errors of Both Kinds and the Correlation Between the Numerator and Denominator of theF-Ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent a Type I error, the alpha value was lowered to .01. Furthermore, the ANOVA is a robust statistical test and it is likely that the tests will still be statistically valid (Donaldson, 1968;Field, 2009). Table 7 shows the results show the results of the ANOVA.…”
Section: Self-report Versus Caregiver Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent a Type I error, the alpha value was lowered to .01. Furthermore, the ANOVA is a robust statistical test and it is likely that the tests will still be statistically valid (Donaldson, 1968;Field, 2009). Table 7 shows the results show the results of the ANOVA.…”
Section: Self-report Versus Caregiver Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that our approximation to model the envelope contribution with a single power-law Plummer profile is not expected to affect our detection of disk-like structures from the visibility curves at long baselines since a flatter inner density power law index produces a steeper visibility curve. 5 For more information on the Fisher test, see for exampleDonaldson (1968) and references therein.Article number, page 11 of 47 A&A proofs: manuscript no. ms-langedit-arxiv…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of these tests were consistent with the results from the ANOVAs. Note that numerous studies have reported robustness of the F-statistic with non-normal data, especially when the sample size is large as in our study (Donaldson, 1968; Ramseyer and Tcheng, 1973; Bevan et al, 1974). When reporting significance values of factors and interactions, partial eta-squared was reported as the effect size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 51%