2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2016.7759674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness to connectivity loss for collaborative mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus (Leung et al, 2011b;Leung et al, 2012) examine the conditions that allow distributed inference to reach the same result as a centralized equivalent approach. Another approach (Quraishi et al, 2016) leverages the progress in the field of distributed computing to improve the robustness to connectivity losses, while (Tuna et al, 2015) evaluates the use of Wireless Sensor Network-based communication which is less reliable and predictable, but offers a flexible architecture with self-organization capabilities.…”
Section: Network Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus (Leung et al, 2011b;Leung et al, 2012) examine the conditions that allow distributed inference to reach the same result as a centralized equivalent approach. Another approach (Quraishi et al, 2016) leverages the progress in the field of distributed computing to improve the robustness to connectivity losses, while (Tuna et al, 2015) evaluates the use of Wireless Sensor Network-based communication which is less reliable and predictable, but offers a flexible architecture with self-organization capabilities.…”
Section: Network Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decentralized allocation schemes are more conducive to the distribution of tasks and data which compensates for the absence of a central server. Such pooling of computational resources may target specific modules such as correspondence detection [26] and global correspondences consistency checks [27], distributed inference [27,28] and map storage [29,30].…”
Section: Decentralized Allocation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%