2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock burst prediction probability model based on case analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vibration is a semisine wave, the frequency is 20 Hz, and the vibration time is that for one cycle [29][30][31][32]. Wu et al [33] analyzed the rock-burst potential of roadway under different buried depth conditions. The hazard level of roadway depth and rock-burst potential is shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vibration is a semisine wave, the frequency is 20 Hz, and the vibration time is that for one cycle [29][30][31][32]. Wu et al [33] analyzed the rock-burst potential of roadway under different buried depth conditions. The hazard level of roadway depth and rock-burst potential is shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is meaningful to study the rock-burst potential under different superposed dynamic and static loads Table 3. Quantitative assessment of the impact of seismicity on the rock-burst potential [27,33]. During the static analysis, the boundary of the model is fixed.…”
Section: Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He then successfully trained a model based on the Support Vector Machine algorithm. Wu (2019) used the Least Squares Support Vector Machine algorithm to create a rockburst forecast model and by conducting sensitivity analyses reported that the ratio of tangential stress to the uniaxial compressive strength has the greatest influence on the forecast. used the Logistic Regression algorithm in a database consisting of rockburst and non-rockburst incidents.…”
Section: Machine Learning In Rockburst Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al [1] introduced three hybrid support vector machine (SVM) models which were optimized using heuristic algorithms i.e., genetic algorithm, grid search method, and particle swarm optimization (PSO) for determining the RB. Another hybrid model of least squares SVM-PSO was developed by Wu et al [73] to determine a non-linear relationship between the model input parameters and RB and to evaluate the risk associated with the RB. The risk level of RB was evaluated and predicted in the study conducted by Zhou et al [74] using another model, which was a combination of the firefly algorithm and ANN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%