1966
DOI: 10.1029/jz071i010p02651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock failure under the confined Brazilian test

Abstract: The Brazilian, or indirect tensile, test, in which a disk is loaded in a diametral plane by forces applied at opposite ends of a diameter, is extended by jacketing the specimen and applying an additional confining pressure. In this way failure may be studied over a range of conditions in which the least principal stress varies from tensile to compressive. The fracture is always an extension fracture in the loaded diametral plane, even if all principal stresses are compressive. The stress analysis is based on e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8b, c,d,e are 43.81,48.22,51.63,and 59.74 MPa,respectively. From the comparison among the CT images, it is obvious that the fracture is tensile in the loaded diametral plane, regardless of the levels of the confinement and the loading rate, which is the same as reported by Jaeger and Hoskins (1966). The fracture is more obvious when the rocks are under 10 MPa confinement (Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Loading Rate and Hydrostatic Confinementsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8b, c,d,e are 43.81,48.22,51.63,and 59.74 MPa,respectively. From the comparison among the CT images, it is obvious that the fracture is tensile in the loaded diametral plane, regardless of the levels of the confinement and the loading rate, which is the same as reported by Jaeger and Hoskins (1966). The fracture is more obvious when the rocks are under 10 MPa confinement (Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Loading Rate and Hydrostatic Confinementsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, the dynamic tensile strength of the one under 20 MPa hydrostatic confinement is 56.37 MPa, which is only 6.37 MPa higher than the former. This decrease of the increment is also observed for rocks tested statically and dynamically under confinement in the literature (Jaeger and Hoskins 1966;Lindholm et al 1974).…”
Section: Effects Of Loading Rate and Hydrostatic Confinementsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extension fracture is then postulated to form when wedges are forced into the disc. Jaeger and Hoskins [9] stated, however, that the formation of wedges cannot be the primary means of failure as the wedges are not observed in every case. Their experimental evidence indicates that failure begins as an extension fracture at the centre and propagates to the surface.…”
Section: -W(3r Z + X 2) a = (2) ~R (R 2 -X 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li and Wong (2013) show the evolution of the state of art about the subject, analysing the 43 most important works, in the view of the authors, from 1943-2011. The papers most directly related to this article are: Sheep (1943), Hondros (1959), Colback (1966), Jaeger and Hoskins (1966), Jaeger (1967), Hudson et al (1972), Wijk (1978), Yanagidani et al (1978), Sundaram and Corrales (1980), Yu et al (2006) and Markides et al (2010Markides et al ( , 2011. These publications were critically examined, but did not reveal any references to the aspects emphasised here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%