2013
DOI: 10.1201/b14084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock Mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An assessment was also carried out using the GSI method from [24]. The analysis showed that tuffaceous sandstone has an RQD value of 7.05 and GSI [25] value is 18.5, but the results of qualitative analysis with the GSI [24] give a value of 20-36. Joint analysis of tuffaceous claystone shows that the rock has an RQD of 5.03 and a GSI value by [26] is 17.5, but the results of qualitative analysis with GSI [24] give a value of 7-19.…”
Section: Rock Mass Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assessment was also carried out using the GSI method from [24]. The analysis showed that tuffaceous sandstone has an RQD value of 7.05 and GSI [25] value is 18.5, but the results of qualitative analysis with the GSI [24] give a value of 20-36. Joint analysis of tuffaceous claystone shows that the rock has an RQD of 5.03 and a GSI value by [26] is 17.5, but the results of qualitative analysis with GSI [24] give a value of 7-19.…”
Section: Rock Mass Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melasti Beach area At this moment, to develop the area, the region administrator is constructing a tourism facility by excavating a rock mass near the beach. The rock Slope which is resulted from excavation activities can be unstable because of the activating moment of the rock mass is greater than the resisting moment (Sivakugan et al, 2013). Therefore, to avoid damage to nearby areas due to excavation activity, a study is needed to be conducted about the rock mass that is being excavated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%