Abstract:We analyse daily lead-lag patterns in US equity and credit default swap (CDS) returns. We first document that equity returns robustly lead CDS returns. However, we find that the CDSlag is due to common (and not firm-specific) news and arises predominantly in response to positive (instead of negative) equity market news. We provide an explanation for this newsspecific price discovery based on dealers in the CDS market exploiting their informational advantage vis-à-vis institutional investors with hedging demands. In support of this explanation we find that the CDS-lag and its news-specificity are related to various firm-level proxies for hedging demand in the cross-section as well measures for economy-wide informational asymmetries over time.JEL classification: G12, G15, G21 Keywords: price discovery, CDS, hedging demand, informational asymmetries 1 Marsh: i.marsh@city.ac.uk; Wagner: w.wagner@uvt.nl and wolf.wagner@dsf.nl. The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from NCCR Trade Regulation. We would like to thank Ana-Maria Fuertes, Aneel Keswani, Chensheng Lu, Richard Payne, Asani Sarkar and seminar participants at Aberdeen University and Cass Business School for constructive discussions, and an anonymous hedge fund for providing some of the data used in the project. Excellent research assistance from Norman Niemer is gratefully acknowledged.
2
IntroductionA key interest of the finance profession is in understanding how new information is incorporated into securities prices. One approach is the study of price discovery across markets. If new information is simultaneously priced into different markets, this is evidence of informational efficiency. Evidence of one market pricing information faster than another by contrast suggests market inefficiencies. Studies on price discovery abound and often find some sort of inefficiencies in that one market leads in price discovery. 4 In this paper we explore the idea that price discovery may in fact be news-specific. Traders in different markets may not be universally informed or uninformed. Rather, traders choosing to operate in one market may have an advantage (or disadvantage) with respect to one type of information but not necessarily with respect to other innovations. This could cause price discovery not to be unconditionally in favour of one market but to depend upon the type of innovation. It would also suggest a more nuanced view on the informational efficiency of markets -in that may only hold conditional on specific information.We focus our analysis on price discovery in equity and CDS markets. The evidence on whether equity returns lead CDS price changes is mixed. Longstaff, Mithal and Neis (2005) suggest that both markets move simultaneously (but that both lead the corporate bond market) while Norden and Weber (2009) 6 There is solid evidence that with very few exceptions CDS markets price information faster than corporate bond markets, although arbitrage relationships tie credit spreads and CDS prices together in the long run (Blanco,...