2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rocking activation of free standing elements in real conditions: A safe experimentally-based acceleration limit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, from the time history responses in Figure 7, a pedestal wobbling without significant uplift on the edges is observed at about 9.5 s. Such behavior, which was detected also from the measurements of the gyroscope and the vertical accelerometers, is also confirmed by the LVDT time history in Figure 7D. This response mode may be generated by imperfections at the base of the pedestal, thus confirming the findings in Wittich and Hutchinson 50 and Berto et al 38 . For the 2nd shock, when the table peak acceleration is reached (i.e., at 11.9 s), the onset of slight rocking is detected by the different amplitudes of the acceleration of the shake table and pedestal in Figure 7A.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, from the time history responses in Figure 7, a pedestal wobbling without significant uplift on the edges is observed at about 9.5 s. Such behavior, which was detected also from the measurements of the gyroscope and the vertical accelerometers, is also confirmed by the LVDT time history in Figure 7D. This response mode may be generated by imperfections at the base of the pedestal, thus confirming the findings in Wittich and Hutchinson 50 and Berto et al 38 . For the 2nd shock, when the table peak acceleration is reached (i.e., at 11.9 s), the onset of slight rocking is detected by the different amplitudes of the acceleration of the shake table and pedestal in Figure 7A.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this regard, it is interesting to compare the observed experimental results with the theoretical value ac${a}_c$ of the minimum horizontal acceleration for the onset of rocking. In no‐sliding condition this value is conventionally assumed equal to the pseudo‐static limit ac=0.33emB/Hg${a}_c = \ B/Hg$, with the meaning of the symbols described in Section 2.2, as discussed in Berto et al 38 …”
Section: Further Investigations On the Experimental Outcomes For The ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from Housner 6 who proposed the equation of motion for a rigid rocking block (Figure 1A), numerous studies [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] have investigated the effect of block and ground motion characteristics on the full range of rocking response. Others have assessed the response of rocking non-structural components, 19,20 while testing campaigns 19,21 have explored the validity of analytical solutions. In other words, focusing on rocking is self-explanatory; staying with IDA may not be as simple to explain apart from a certain affinity of the second author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is a well‐known topic in the scientific literature, there have been many recent and significant developments, such as the derivation of closed‐form solutions (Kounadis, 2015), the investigation on the role of the friction coefficient (Gesualdo et al., 2016; Gesualdo, Iannuzzo, Minutolo, & Monaco, 2018; Gesualdo, Iannuzzo, Monaco, & Penta, 2018), the influence of heavy masses on the rocking behavior (Gesualdo, Iannuzzo, & Monaco, 2018), the assessment of the existing protocols for shake table testing of freestanding objects (D'Angela et al., 2021), and the study of the seismic response of storage racks (Malhotra, 2009). From the experimental point of view, recent researches aim at determining the friction coefficients between the rigid body and the base (Monaco et al., 2014) and the minimum horizontal acceleration required to activate rocking (Berto et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past years, new concepts and techniques have been developed for protecting structures from earthquakes and severe winds (Gutierrez Soto & Adeli, 2017;Naeim & Kelly, 1999) on the basis of approaches exploiting pas-sive (Andersson et al, 2015;Lin et al, 2010), semi-active, and active (Aldemir et al, 2012;Bitaraf et al, 2012;El-Khoury & Adeli, 2013;Gutierrez Soto & Adeli, 2018 control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%