1998
DOI: 10.2307/2694695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rockshelters and Hunter-Gatherer Adaptation to the Pleistocene/Holocene Transition

Abstract: A major focus of archaeological field investigations over the past four decades in eastern North America has been the excavation of rockshelters. Many of the Southern highland rockshelters investigated during this period yielded evidence of initial occupations by Dalton horizon (10,500 to 10,000 B.P.) hunter-gatherers. Data concerning the Dalton components from a sample of 45 of these shelters are reviewed and discussed in order to identify variability in site functions and to address the question, Why were Da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Williams (2013) ran a series of tests using the same dataset, which indicated that while it was necessary to correct open site data, those from rockshelters were best used without such corrections, which tend to artificially flatten trends (by overinflation of earlier time periods, leading to an overall flatter curve throughout the last 35,000 years). Conversely, Ulm (2013) considered that rockshelter deposits may be prone to taphonomic impacts owing to their restricted area and often intense periods of use (see also Walthall, 1998). We therefore present both the final time-series curve with all data corrected, as well as the more widely accepted combination of corrected open site data and uncorrected data from rockshelters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williams (2013) ran a series of tests using the same dataset, which indicated that while it was necessary to correct open site data, those from rockshelters were best used without such corrections, which tend to artificially flatten trends (by overinflation of earlier time periods, leading to an overall flatter curve throughout the last 35,000 years). Conversely, Ulm (2013) considered that rockshelter deposits may be prone to taphonomic impacts owing to their restricted area and often intense periods of use (see also Walthall, 1998). We therefore present both the final time-series curve with all data corrected, as well as the more widely accepted combination of corrected open site data and uncorrected data from rockshelters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial movement of Paleoindian groups to and throughout the Ame-ricas has been debated for over a century; common themes include the timing of initial arrival and settlement, routes, parent populations or cultural groups, mobility, and resource use, among others (e.g., Anderson and Gillam, 2000;Hoffecker et al, 1993;Kelly and Todd, 1988;Sellet, 1998;Torroni et al, 1991;Walthall, 1998). Archaeologists generally characterize Clovis as highly mobile, big-game hunters who spread throughout the Americas in relatively short period of time (Kelly and Todd, 1988) or whose technologies were widely adopted by sparse and scattered in situ pre-clovis populations (Waters and Stafford, 2007).…”
Section: Processes Of Territory Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with ethnographic studies which indicate that present day use of rockshelters is limited to short-term hunting camps, refuges from inclement weather or for occasional ceremonial purposes. Rockshelters are, by and large, not long-term occupation sites where food is prepared or consumed in any quantity (Walthall 1998).…”
Section: Task Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%