2021
DOI: 10.32614/rj-2021-066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ROCnReg: An R Package for Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Inference With and Without Covariates

Abstract: This paper introduces the package ROCnReg that allows estimating the pooled ROC curve, the covariate-specific ROC curve, and the covariate-adjusted ROC curve by different methods, both from (semi) parametric and nonparametric perspectives and within Bayesian and frequentist paradigms. From the estimated ROC curve (pooled, covariate-specific, or covariate-adjusted), several summary measures of discriminatory accuracy, such as the (partial) area under the ROC curve and the Youden index, can be obtained. The pack… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also present the logit transformation‐based confidence interval, which is obtained by backtransforming the Wald‐type confidence interval of the logit‐transformed ϕ 0 . As a comparison, we present the results using the seimiparametric method by Janes and Pepe (2009) (Column “JP‐SP”), implemented in R/CRAN package ROCnReg (Rodríguez‐Álvarez and Inacio, 2020). All results are summarized over 5000 Monte Carlo datasets.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also present the logit transformation‐based confidence interval, which is obtained by backtransforming the Wald‐type confidence interval of the logit‐transformed ϕ 0 . As a comparison, we present the results using the seimiparametric method by Janes and Pepe (2009) (Column “JP‐SP”), implemented in R/CRAN package ROCnReg (Rodríguez‐Álvarez and Inacio, 2020). All results are summarized over 5000 Monte Carlo datasets.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a bias decreases, however, when sample size increases. To investigate whether this bias could be due to the prior information used, we have conducted a sensitivity analysis with a data‐driven prior 35 (p. 532) and the results, not shown, were unchanged. In turn, the OVLDPM‐BB$$ {\mathrm{OVL}}_{\mathrm{DPM}\hbox{-} \mathrm{BB}} $$ estimator provides unbiased estimates in almost all cases considered; the only exception is in Scenario III when the underlying true value of the overlap coefficient is very high and the sample size is small (eg, false(ntrueD,nDfalse)=false(50,50false)$$ \left({n}_{\overline{D}},{n}_D\right)=\left(50,50\right) $$).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each PheRS, we assessed the following performance measures relative to the PASC status: (1) overall performance with Nagelkerke’s pseudo-R 2 using R packages “rcompanion” [ 45 ], (2) accuracy with Brier score using R package “DescTools” [ 46 ]; and (3) ability to discriminate between PASC cases and matched controls as measured by the area under the covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic (AROC; semiparametric frequentist inference) curve (denoted AAUC) using R package “ROCnReg” [ 47 ]. Firth’s bias reduction method was used to resolve the problem of separation in logistic regression (R package “brglm2”) [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%