2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rodent consumption by hunter-gatherers in north Patagonian Andean forests (Argentina): Insights from the small vertebrate taphonomic analysis of two late Holocene archaeological sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific cut marks related with a careful skinning was observed for the caviidae species Cavia aperea and Galea tixiensis from the Argentinean Pampas [15] suggesting the use of the skin. A pattern similar to the observed for the Loncoman Cave small mammal sequence was obtained for some archaeological sites located in the north-Patagonian Andean forest demonstrating that the rodent consumption was not an exclusive practice of the hunter-gatherer populations from the steppe [16]. Moreover, the consumed species -G. eublepharid, M. australis, Ctenomys haigi, and possibly also C. sociabilis-are not typical components of the forest's fauna, but from un-forested and xeric environments in the near steppe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Specific cut marks related with a careful skinning was observed for the caviidae species Cavia aperea and Galea tixiensis from the Argentinean Pampas [15] suggesting the use of the skin. A pattern similar to the observed for the Loncoman Cave small mammal sequence was obtained for some archaeological sites located in the north-Patagonian Andean forest demonstrating that the rodent consumption was not an exclusive practice of the hunter-gatherer populations from the steppe [16]. Moreover, the consumed species -G. eublepharid, M. australis, Ctenomys haigi, and possibly also C. sociabilis-are not typical components of the forest's fauna, but from un-forested and xeric environments in the near steppe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It discriminated samples from the Table 1. Minimum number of individuals (MNI) and percentage (%) of the species recovered from early Late-Holocene (ELH), final Late-Holocene (FLH) and Historical times (HT) of Población Anticura archaeological site, from the nearby (<1 km) archaeological site Paredón Lanfré (Andrade and Fernández, 2017), from the current sample of Barn owl pellets collected at the lower Manso river valley (Udrizar Sauthier et al, 2005) and from trap samplings conducted in the area (Piudo and Monteverde, 2012) early Late-Holocene from those from the final Late-Holocene and Historical times. The most dissimilar sample corresponded to the current assemblage (Figure 6).…”
Section: Structure Of Small Mammal Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se realizó la determinación anatómica y taxonómica y se calcularon las unidades de medida de abundancia taxonómica NISP (Número mínimo de especímenes identificados) y MNI (Número mínimo de individuos). Para el MNI se tuvo en cuenta la lateralidad y el estadio de fusión ósea (Lyman, 1994;Mengoni Goñalons, 1999), excepto en el caso de los roedores, en el que el cálculo se hizo sobre cráneos y mandíbulas (Andrade y Fernández, 2017). Cuando dos o más huesos se presentaron unidos por tejido blando, e involucraban menos del 75% del esqueleto del animal, se los consideró como restos articulados (Massigoge et al, 2015), y se los contabilizó de forma separada.…”
Section: Materiales Y Métodosunclassified